IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 21 July 2021 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099143A1389 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=telurix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j3GiT35Nxsi1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177843A138B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id p10so390377qvk.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GGzWr5vSy8PzIaR/0s1hT0oivqxAVQAGEQm0uZ9T6iU=; b=HQoQZDA3krB5Oi/QZwqUXup9n9wtjhRA8D4tOOfJYtZXXdTPLEOcKBdJTKW1XdgaeY SYFSJ9ljsnaPdWRLNAZQCXp1l/VY3BtGxl9QvdnZGCeMbXS70kI2PtjrGPJ3cEjWGmHx dF0t2a35YDKWHoZ3zSpws0SvdiewwIRroNxgg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GGzWr5vSy8PzIaR/0s1hT0oivqxAVQAGEQm0uZ9T6iU=; b=I3tznxzNiCugi73QZCTd1i1DVHdIduJirL2Z6A243GehXFKEM/5fO3I7uhFRC5zR+N EQE1A2jIcXs3FIWhYx2CkATBeaiMS+wnYHhtBa5XPd7XHDoU8osCljn9E3vvhRzOWgdo XYJa17378aMY+L8kj12ttXTeaJn46wEsEdl1Q8+MiRWnhbXg8CmbDy4Ho25zLOhlSz+6 4jYjR9OzCi4u5hoKLKo6B7vAOz4Qsu79Z2yQhmYhkm/iVcncJOs9hIUFw9UfzF2vQcf8 3agfIpf1vkmCLxW2kkLkukRuEeh4Tnxr3DVAbGq4qnf4YldABXI/33e8I0w++7wPrcZv WQKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ilMCunyjs7SkskOHbPjJFFFfGLnRAE4SklOOlpLLg4t3EIROG xCpPNRGrJoDZdjzyV0MqnJFu4F6K6+9kTg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxo3H2OP73l3JRwbMAej9s16zgSgEvo//PYaUUsX9P2+NrXtm8ubVbtsfCpm3pdhS07QqyGwQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f850:: with SMTP id g16mr33933715qvo.5.1626844451720; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f170.google.com (mail-yb1-f170.google.com. [209.85.219.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t14sm3324694qkm.7.2021.07.20.22.14.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f170.google.com with SMTP id c16so1625137ybl.9; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:404:: with SMTP id 4mr42689953ybe.171.1626844449914; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162559677588.2044.9942407728164856156@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwaFS7gLV9YxpuWqedSyVQ3bAoJNQxVM5=D+Hc0tFTcS1w@mail.gmail.com> <cc768731-f6d4-14a2-df08-bd2e13214a70@cisco.com> <HE1PR07MB4441B42BB0E367FCECFF327093E19@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMDaUju+S7aewMBvyOEddNbjhri253HQa8Tm-5Am+nr7bQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMDaUju+S7aewMBvyOEddNbjhri253HQa8Tm-5Am+nr7bQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:13:58 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxt_+E5zWHM6KLTsFNVeyzKM_st6vLPkja6stf46mWCf5g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxt_+E5zWHM6KLTsFNVeyzKM_st6vLPkja6stf46mWCf5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Flemming Andreasen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008ac1a405c79b3d9e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/wDTSfItb1-yhfaUssGVsbUvCKaw>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:14:20 -0000

I have already provided my review on MMUSIC.
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 5:37 AM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi RTCWEB folks,
>
> If you have not already reviewed draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04 (aka
> BUNDLEbis), it would be great if you could do so before the RTCWEB meeting
> next week, since the JSEP update is linked to it.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ted Hardie
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 4:46 PM Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=
> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> >> I've reviewed the diff between this and RFC8843.  Looks good.  Thanks
>> for a good shepherd writeup too.  Just a couple of comments:
>> >> The registrations in Section 16 should make it clear they are
>> updating, not creating, the entries they describe.  RFC 8843 created them.
>> > Ok. I believe the authors can make that change later.
>>
>> I am not really sure what the change would look like.
>>
>> For example, if I do the following change in Section 16.1:
>>
>> s/This document adds the MID SDES item to the IANA "RTP SDES Item Types"
>> registry as follows: /This document updates the MID SDES item registered in
>> RFC 8843 in the IANA "RTP SDES Item Types" registry as follows
>>
>> ...it seems like all the information is updated.
>>
>> >> It would probably make things even smoother to indicate in the
>> shepherd writeup that RTCWEB reviewed this, so that their JSEP update
>> doesn't conflict with it.  (And if they didn't, please at a minimum forward
>> >> them the IETF Last Call announcement when it comes out.)  I know the
>> writeup already describes the separation of work, but we're likely to be
>> asked to confirm that there was more coordination than that.
>> > Good point. We did not have RTCWEB review the update per se, however a
>> couple of the people that reviewed it are intimately involved in the RTCWEB
>> work. Should we alert the RTCWEB group at this point or wait until the IETF
>> Last Call ?
>>
>> As Flemming said, people that have reviewed BUNDLEbis are also active in
>> RTCWEB. In addition, when Flemming sent out the publication request e-mail,
>> I did forward it to the RTCWEB list.
>>
>> As RTCWEB is meeting this week, I guess it can also be mentioned there.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Christer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email