Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 07 October 2011 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC5E21F8BF8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.015
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.015 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.416, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ne2ASsnyzLTP for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C2C21F8BF7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=1352; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318025657; x=1319235257; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ogrUBLGNQHdXedNYXzS1NK1OsfGDGMEuOFmb+R6qYzc=; b=j8apuK2CVjHTY7Ock3Dsig9+qLQkBQNScFYwRjdMu/eVzWKh2p3DyzAH ygm961z0E+jEnzrlyaOMPAk3QN64wbNST6ZoITto18pPwoWjgM4Uq2eds iYtHUMpjAkmWxRSpk7xPPPfG7fQpenMu+ykbTDQMTZYvEsmbI+aP82Sww o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAO14j06rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABEqBiBBYFTAQEBAwESAScuBgsFCwtGVwYuB4dcmVcBnjKGT2EEh32LcoUojD8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,504,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="6612813"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2011 22:14:17 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (sjc-fluffy-8914.cisco.com [10.20.249.165]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p97MEGCD028772; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:14:17 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:14:16 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <777F0250-BB18-4F0D-82FD-629FA6B76E48@cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:11:03 -0000

Hi Ted, 

I do plan to submit a signaling draft before next friday. The draft will based on figuring out what the minimal thing is we need to have wrapped around SDP to be able to implement offer/answer in a way that meets our uses cases. 

Cullen


On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> At today's Chairs call, Cullen, Magnus and I had a discussion of how to make progress on the signaling discussion.  We feel the mailing list discussion needs to have more concrete proposals in order to make progress, and so we're putting forward the following:
> 
> 1) If you plan to put forward a draft proposing a concrete solution in this space, please send your name to the mailing list with that intent by October 7th *THIS FRIDAY*.
> 
> 2) Please have a -00 draft out for discussion by October 14th (the following Friday).  This is to allow for a discussion and update prior to the -01 deadlines.
> 
> 3) We will hold a conference call to discuss the drafts on October 21st (the Friday after that).
> 
> Updates based on that discussion then have until the -01 drafts deadline to be complete.
> 
> This is aggressive, but we feel we need to have at least -00s for the different ideas in place in order to make real progress.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Ted, Magnus, Cullen