Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)

Neil Stratford <neils@belltower.co.uk> Wed, 12 October 2011 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <neils@vipadia.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C5F21F8B95 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dR26A28Bs-3m for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C27921F88B7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iaby26 with SMTP id y26so742650iab.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.24.96 with SMTP id u32mr11961953ibb.61.1318412782103; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: neils@vipadia.com
Received: by 10.231.200.146 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E955775.10206@alvestrand.no>
References: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmYgQ+yb=pDp1J2_PVa1SkxTOuaUCM02Vt6-iGabwif1g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCUTiPO3eASjn0mbRA9YCF6TMmGGOjQ4NkVkvzVMN39Gg@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnx=qoS_pqyC45WVEYEFqj-3eP9g_kyhAUaOO6He_UEfw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCibnPLrEq1234bUMXpiKBK0+22mqwYOM__CpcO2nOayg@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfms2bt-WPtMeosFQz3-aSf2L6mfX+i68tw45sSgix561Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E8D6507.8000707@ericsson.com> <CALiegf=VyViX2arp0gr0dK4WN_jv=bjwP0LUAxRf=quTxrYrUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfn15szv-2yXeWptWjsQC2CwVODg_X90gD4odZkCR0LzvA@mail.gmail.com> <4E955775.10206@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:46:22 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: dt6QjMatYTczh96_THON_0V01jw
Message-ID: <CABRok6n6UA_nFfLzQ4K+H0+idspEsymW29OZH0J5q1ewF3PpRw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Neil Stratford <neils@belltower.co.uk>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015177414288b6b9d04af16e599
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:46:23 -0000

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote

> One of the worries I have with doing a "low level spec" unconstrained by
> our present competence (ignorance?) in  is that I'm reasonably sure we have
> the knowledge to generate and parse SDP, because the codebases we are
> building on already generate and parse SDP, and the information present
> there is enough to set up calls, because we're already setting up calls
> using that information.
>
> I'm less sure of our "getting things right" if we start off by describing
> the capabilities and control knobs to be exposed in an unconstrained API.


As a counter argument, those very same codebases that generate and parse SDP
also contain internal APIs that look a lot like a low level spec API, and
the information they present is enough to generate and parse SDP and set up
calls.

Maybe we don't like those APIs and perhaps they expose too much as they were
never intended to be made public, but they do exist already.

Neil