IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 27 May 2015 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0549F1A908D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t4MLZlzDFk0s for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E58881A88BD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=363; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432756810; x=1433966410; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=o0/KfZ03Xwr+x3/gmFlG2qmvGVJ6V+Iu3yUr8gIfv6s=; b=AWitrgc6h4xJWJD8ozhFJro4BghdzdZrklYqkugszQBTSkF2Ma4UsB8T H6EjI/x/+S3J2ees+vflshhCMOCOv4hGI2o6ZT1LF2Te6zKlF0/+aEeOe rhgeduXbN8ljE7zF7cDnXa1aCvqFPgsd7kHoe3LZ+n7oAncomUda3DZ8p 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AYBADxIGZV/5pdJa1cgxCBMgbBXgmHUAKBQzgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCIBAQEDATo/BQsCAQgYHhAyJQIEDgWIJQjSLAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLOoRSMweDF4EWAQSTCIsPAZcuI4N4b4FGgQEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,507,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="153918103"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 May 2015 20:00:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4RK09X7015383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 May 2015 20:00:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.147]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:00:08 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment
Thread-Index: AQHQmLe7UTUOzOhqWEezi9M+ZLdOuw==
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 20:00:08 +0000
Message-ID: <EDBAF883-E9E6-4810-8168-AFE648161E85@cisco.com>
References: <D8920B96-7C22-4F9F-B323-FC59120C7508@ieca.com> <5531EFD2.5010107@alvestrand.no> <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF81962D96C@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AAEC0E1EC8@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <5537CA1F.1060209@alvestrand.no> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E75341E@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <55412808.7040409@alvestrand.no> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E7547BD@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E7547BD@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.165]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <23ABE647649C714B9CB35884C2204DBE@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/wZnqAEoxSygpxN80azTlwsB7HvM>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-gateways- Statis IP Address Comment
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 20:00:11 -0000

> On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:30 AM, Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@unify.com> wrote:
> 
> So I suggest the following text.
> 
> "A WebRTC gateway which is deployed where it can be reached with a static IP address (as seen from the client), does not need to support full ICE; it therefore MAY implement ICE-Lite only".
> 
> Regards
> Andy

+1

v2.16.0 | Report a Bug | By Email