IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs) (UNCLASSIFIED)

<stephane.proust@orange.com> Thu, 17 January 2013 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane.proust@orange.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6C521F84E4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:41:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UczF7cwE7kqQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:41:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FD521F8425 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:41:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 6A80F2DC216; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:41:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.183]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4E17E238079; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:41:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::a42f:c628:bc76:d592]) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:41:17 +0100
From: stephane.proust@orange.com
To: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>, "Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs) (UNCLASSIFIED)
Thread-Index: AQHN9L5d2aco9FXWy0qHvMzvdhbM1JhNg1+AgAASqeA=
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:41:17 +0000
Message-ID: <18441_1358433678_50F80D8E_18441_583_1_2842AD9A45C83B44B57635FD4831E60A075F80@PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <8486C8728176924BAF5BDB2F7D7EEDDF4907E630@ucolhp9l.easf.csd.disa.mil> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338CF2A76@XMB104ADS.rim.net> <7CBFD4609D19C043A4AC4FD8381C6E26023CF7B3@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net> <50F80846.5030300@nostrum.com> <7CBFD4609D19C043A4AC4FD8381C6E26023CF832@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net> <C15DBD56-8014-42B7-8A07-68DB13AB81E2@phonefromhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <C15DBD56-8014-42B7-8A07-68DB13AB81E2@phonefromhere.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.10.24.110314
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs) (UNCLASSIFIED)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:41:21 -0000

> AMR-WB is 'future legacy' ;-)

It seems we already live in the future: Currently HD voice with AMR-WB is launched in more than 50 mobile networks all over the world (more than 35 countries) with more than 130 WB-AMR enabled mobile devices

Probably at present time a little bit more AMR-WB codecs deployed than OPUS codecs.

Just check on the GSA Web site

http://www.gsacom.com/news/gsa_358.php

Stephane

De : rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Tim Panton
Envoyé : jeudi 17 janvier 2013 15:28
À : Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
Cc : rtcweb@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs) (UNCLASSIFIED)


On 17 Jan 2013, at 14:24, Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:

I subsume under "legacy telephone network" both the fixed network
(G.711) and the mobile network (AMR-WB).

I guess that more calls are made with GSM.610 than AMR-WB

AMR-WB is 'future legacy' ;-)

T.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email