IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

Svein Yngvar Willassen <svein@appear.in> Fri, 10 January 2014 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <svein@comoyo.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375D71AE0CC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:52:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xjrl-5UvdJdu for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:52:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E237D1AE0C6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:52:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id to1so1643826ieb.30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:51:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3fb3+wC7xYR+4/z1NbhVP5KMvkpXe2Zmyz+Hb4rwjao=; b=fUEYj1QcIcF+4nGtZBQfhUANZ4ZnUKVFjeB5phym3/zImZwZpAaffOU9tdjFjbnBUV 19jzVXnssDMGE9b4ekF4dhqsed8WRN1CGJnb86SPdMbl6niw3IuFEaNMN9ggfFksK9rj koasOIDehQtZd75BAcbYvw4uwUFyQWw2Z/PE1Ec9uKPDl1/qyNeYsxK9WMjp2e+KKj54 KArUMCWO9qSi2POUgVUvsTG1/QCUAjtEOAQROrAff/YhHFPgmrYgSGAGCwxEEGmMVikX xj5hH7qfrBHvFxjsTRlVUrOzmAGeeJg7R3awRlB6rySh104hJ0LmNUugk+ywjf9UMccI RrzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQky0hVPxsJcjvn6uFQmmlsAQtQsXPp+r8ytexKvo85eYlnDtIK3LO8/sSWvPJp8yUfe/1Bb
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.154.102 with SMTP id vn6mr5682762igb.15.1389387118668; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:51:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.103.9 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:51:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52D0325E.5080305@tele.no>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <52D0325E.5080305@tele.no>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:51:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJcPMn=rhL1cF1pfX=JdVzLOaAsXRxEEw5VbZZeOx9y5VOhsUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Svein Yngvar Willassen <svein@appear.in>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd7581eaa0ec004efa3e591"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:52:11 -0000

   1.

   All entities MUST support H.264
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      2.

   All entities MUST support VP8
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      3.

   All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      4.

   Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8, other entities MUST support at
   least one of H.264 and VP8
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:  *Not always having a common codec requires transcoding. This
      option will create a barrier for extending web based services to mobile
      devices.*
      5.

   All entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them: *Not always having a common codec requires transcoding. This
      option will create a barrier for creating web based video services and
      limit the universe of services.*
      6.

   All entities MUST support H.261
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      7.

   There is no MTI video codec
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them: *Not always having a common codec requires transcoding. This
      option will create a barrier for creating web based video services and
      limit the universe of services.*
      8.

   All entities MUST support H.261 and all entities MUST support at least
   one of H.264 and VP8
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      9.

   All entities MUST support Theora
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      10.

   All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.261}
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]:
*Acceptable *
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      11.

   All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.263}
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      12.

   All entities MUST support decoding using both H.264 and VP8, and MUST
   support encoding using at least one of H.264 or VP8
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      13.

   All entities MUST support H.263
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      14.

   All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, Theora}
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:
      15.

   All entities MUST support decoding using Theora.
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them: *Not always having a common codec requires transcoding. This
      option will create a barrier for creating web based video services and
      limit the universe of services. (It is not enough to only have a
mandatory
      decoder)*
      16.

   All entities MUST support Motion JPEG
   1.

      Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*
      2.

      Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
      them:


--
Svein Willassen, ph.d
https://appear.in/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email