IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] UDP transport problem

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Thu, 13 February 2014 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D391A0012 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:28:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_12t_Z59seu for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:28:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493051A000C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:28:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id j1so14021741iga.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:28:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=esUlOHrHKbpiM75KVpPX/1k77CBfhmRwTnkVE1kZ6X0=; b=f+IviFUWmHgu2X4d9ABeXo5HIJJSDa4XzZpkvTAe/Pjtw3jP2yZ4nbigUEoiGRLPOS +jPt77vLPRuwakVJe/Kpw3/sV8jX3YvNavasIzVrrYUCyHfWW4kLEGxw0+QVCXgkRQMF KDP/eRl/7j5UoFMbyU+h5GtmMRwtrPxmZQbZr8vmh2H2eSgKgzKQjg3VqpdAKkhHgehF L8NhVtVFY7Yx07GYgqpx1blVp8vsL8OsWz+sWwXU1lqXJR4FTECZP/cBIhAtB1UKRpBt s47/VlUt3V35JQQsMsHl9N7NOUcLuvaFELjEjZBrW5UKz+3TWlkc874yQUjsPTZaZOgR vGwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQngZ034Fiv14Qsc6/MtN4BgUCUYij7c+enMPw6NwdOIlOoxFNsDzUdQI8kYc4+gmZBlj5Au
X-Received: by 10.50.20.39 with SMTP id k7mr6153130ige.13.1392330495937; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ro10sm10542801igb.6.2014.02.13.14.28.14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52FD46F4.7030804@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:28:04 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CAD6AjGRiQ1UF5n3JG9HPRQFM+TD54Xz-dpTn5u9bX+__BMfesQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVbZp7yBvpY1ARuaBXS=TOipY=BhXzrd=h5DY-76oF9Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSxS4jNRGotsE_no0XhewvDqcVZ+Kmx1aMW9qorqSKR+w@mail.gmail.com> <52FD2FA4.8040701@alvestrand.no> <CAD6AjGTbSJEV2cJj5QyLktyZPv8SJa7h-QHKVtdUXnF3K6xwHA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTbSJEV2cJj5QyLktyZPv8SJa7h-QHKVtdUXnF3K6xwHA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/x-jV9mAStYtY7y5TtLFWvKltU3I
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] UDP transport problem
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:28:19 -0000

On 13/02/2014 4:20 PM, Cb B wrote:
> DNS runs over TCP as well. But that's not the point. The question is 
> can we include native SCTP as an option in 
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports? What is the downside? CB

The biggest downside, as I see it, is that 90%+ of the world runs 
Windows and that platform does not support SCTP natively (a fact that 
you have mentioned before). I am all in favor of SCTP, but I think you 
need to solve the Windows problem before this solution become meaningful.

Gili

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email