IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Wed, 08 May 2013 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <emil@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDCE21F93BC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6nAwPewbiB-P for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x229.google.com (mail-bk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFD621F90C4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id jc3so982083bkc.28 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 May 2013 08:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=ZwN+QUjXJOiMhOgAEicuM7hyqiNYhHg8B0FGZJoMsXc=; b=avZj+1Z3XhD5UVO2B65N+g5m7yk7P1QCJm78HddNQg524ohvkvxQreSNuIA8vmfp5g MAqkSEJIY755zPeMA6hn5S6oGw9gYEX9r2wVC//VD1SXvPh6ye/XKSQ4Z4vSwlJ9sztq FpOPNF+pWX17Kmi4a/yNzODen7taaGA6iIl2SVg0m5OK3cTpfEw/F5pYibmqLzthc0E4 JnmFuJ8PnsrzuFtfgZ9zLbKM5ejZOWltmofrRbLq2fuy9kXXCRxL+XBES6qF+nxmIw1a T8Qq40NVTXZAaaFYZoTRcZCj9Eay3Dr3+0gR8hB8yf9/S/1KnLoCJKfGO84xxyWrco+b v4zw==
X-Received: by 10.204.51.200 with SMTP id e8mr2016273bkg.131.1368028307445; Wed, 08 May 2013 08:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from camionet.local ([83.228.76.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fh8sm8074843bkc.10.2013.05.08.08.51.45 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 08 May 2013 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <518A748D.9020806@jitsi.org>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 18:51:41 +0300
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Organization: Jitsi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
References: <51894846.3090102@nostrum.com> <518A304A.1030609@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <518A304A.1030609@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmaOZPmCCJ3qpgD5TYRSpQ4o/5860LIY2hM9XgyWr7mKw1nlfJAZeCAg2LymMxeXCpXm6Sk
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 15:51:49 -0000

On 08.05.13, 14:00, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> To put a blunt point on it: Either send less than ~32 streams, or give
> a=ssrc attributes.

I might be missing something ... probably even a lot, but why do we need
the above limitation? Why is it not an option to just let the
application provide the relationship with the MediaStream?

Requiring that all SSRCs be known in advance or imposing re-offer/answer
exchanges seems like waaay too heavy a requirement that can add severe
restrictions on the way applications and topologies are designed.

Emil


-- 
https://jitsi.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email