Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Thu, 21 November 2013 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72221AE1CE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:11:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.725
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.725 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id scneDjK6C62Q for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:11:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DD51AE19C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:11:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id E63E5C94BF; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:11:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:11:19 -0500
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Message-ID: <20131121201119.GA59496@verdi>
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <528E5057.30408@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <528E5057.30408@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:11:38 -0000

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>; wrote:
> 
> I have the greatest respect for the chairs, but this is an engraved
> invitation for people to appeal whatever decision might be reached.
> 
> More fundamentally: Voting? At the IETF?? Really?!?
> 
> I sincerely hope we can figure out a better process...

   +1

====

   Additionally, if we are to follow a voting process, we must publish
a list of voters and invent some process to challenge who is included
and who is omitted. This is NOT trivial.

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>;