Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti

"Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <> Tue, 26 February 2013 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8478B21F8826 for <>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:47:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id miENkt574Ems for <>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:47:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E6C21F8821 for <>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:47:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.620.12; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:47:50 +0000
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.620.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:47:50 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.003; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:47:30 +0000
From: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <>, "<>" <>
Thread-Topic: Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
Thread-Index: AQHOFExGxLgqgTDk7Uq8NoYnsLB7sZiMelTQ
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:47:29 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(199002)(189002)(13464002)(377454001)(51444002)(44976002)(66066001)(77982001)(33656001)(47446002)(63696002)(31966008)(56816002)(80022001)(15202345001)(55846006)(50466001)(54316002)(5343655001)(47736001)(16406001)(23726001)(46406002)(49866001)(59766001)(74502001)(46102001)(56776001)(47976001)(53806001)(79102001)(20776003)(50986001)(65816001)(54356001)(76482001)(51856001)(4396001)(47776003)(74662001)(491001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB018;; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 07697999E6
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:47:53 -0000

Where is said draft? Hard to know if this would be time well spent if the draft isn't available. returns 404

Matthew Kaufman

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:08 AM
To: <>
Subject: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti

I would like 25 minutes for presentation of information key to draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti that is not interrupted and 15 minutes for Q/A for the work. 

We have spent many hours of meeting time discussing the way we were going to make a decision around codecs and information needed, but we have not yet spent time discussing the actually information to make the decision. This draft addressees several very key issues, including the actually quality comparison of VP8 and H.264. I think that spending any less time than this would result in a situation where the WG was not making an decisions with the information available. Similarly, other  people that have written other drafts with similar or different views also need to speak up about how much time they need and that we make sure everyone has time to explain the key information, people have time to ask questions about it, and we can make an informed decisions instead of having to discuss the video codecs at many future meetings. 

rtcweb mailing list