Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's define the purpose of WebRTC)
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 14 November 2011 09:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB6D21F8B18 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:59:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.638
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AskP6+XzT7rr for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:59:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36BE21F8B1F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so5870102vws.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.65.36 with SMTP id u4mr33605844vds.58.1321264418151; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:53:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.107.206 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:53:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <FCFB9735-FB48-45C1-9ADF-CA6DBE5299B1@acmepacket.com>
References: <CALiegfkVNVAs_MyU_-4koA4zRwSn1-FwLjY9g_oZVkhi9rSK5Q@mail.gmail.com> <5454E693-5C34-4C77-BA07-2A9EE9EE4AFD@cisco.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C01349FFE@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <1D062974A4845E4D8A343C653804920206D3B7FD@XMB-BGL-414.cisco.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0134A105@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09804691DA2@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com> <CALiegfmf59jb4asUu9LA6YY_aMtKEnM1Wy34KbuLEn3_h1xBXA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmM1PB=VAQjfh4rW3-3C8aumHdWy9nZxD0-BWBq9Kq_tg@mail.gmail.com> <1D062974A4845E4D8A343C653804920206D3BA57@XMB-BGL-414.cisco.com> <CALiegfkWnRT8m4S9pXTxuLsc-p_bhkG3d=PX3qgiFFt5gW5yfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvQYVKOZF88WLCiRseg-qXQdOpKeDU_t9b-yA2GcDBT-w@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOiPxz_swdaG6Aqoch1WAUtjNh4eOQy1QObCDXT_B8azg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtp+LQBRCHgbWdJyrSRcpNQ82i64TJgGtGPrE7+GKcEog@mail.gmail.com> <4EBC3475.90706@alvestrand.no> <CAD5OKxu_-+ZRsqpUBkFSj=tYtOKG0pK3JoQTZHwQGMuBCnp0Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuaWJ3SBv+0gac6EQy6-Lsb-LS_SBXk5FqObKy4mN6wNg@mail.gmail.com> <CCF4FC92-D5AA-43C8-A0B2-8041C9B8E1BD@edvina.net> <CAD5OKxs-pWwDBjwAu=mQVWRZa4H_YPpzQ31=0qxUUj-pJOErcg@mail.gmail.com> <A2DFC694-DBDF-4DB4-8DE0-DD638C7AF2BE@acmepacket.com> <CALiegfkU1qhLmhY9L373pF7j9zwHipFfu4mAuY49RDTNL7V5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <C11CACFE-FE5A-43F2-8B61-6ABC9965B7FC@acmepacket.com> <CALiegfkehnLmWuqBPMRki=tJDTHmJ0e6M3RGX-mDBJNzcAA_DQ@mail.gmail.com> <FCFB9735-FB48-45C1-9ADF-CA6DBE5299B1@acmepacket.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:53:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfkstuyuRJWEvsU7EtHE5V41zavdrN0OZ1OSWtv022P16Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's define the purpose of WebRTC)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:59:18 -0000
2011/11/13 Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>: >> 2011/11/13 Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>: >>> So long as the mechanisms needed to do so don't hurt WebRTC or force a specific architectural model, why do you care? >> >> Some telcos in this WG (and I could find exact mails) would accept >> even if WebRTC uses a pure SIP stack. > > I'm not sure we have the same understanding of the word "telco". A "telco" for me is a telephone-company/telecommunications provider/communications service provider (wireless, landline, cable MSOs, etc.). As far as I can tell, of the 482 members of this mailing list, there are about 32 with email addresses that imply they work for "telcos", and none of them have advocated embedding a SIP stack in the browser. Lots of people on this mailing list work for companies that sell products to "telco's", but most of them do not advocate putting a SIP stack in the browser either.[1] Ok, let me say that with the world "telco" I include telephony/telecommunications companies, telephony vendors (phones, PBXs, SBCs, gateways, softswitches...) and anyone with real interest in interoperability with existing SIP and/or PSTN networks. > Also I really think you're being unfair to people who work for telco's. I have personally spoken off-line with several of the "telco's" that monitor this mailing list, and all of them believed that whatever's needed to interwork to non-WebRTC must not hurt/degrade WebRTC. For example most of them actually *want* SRTP to be used, and even think ICE is needed. Of course they would also prefer to be able to interface to WebRTC with as least cost/complexity as possible, but they know it's not all going to be possible. My concern is that 75% of the traffic in this maillist is about making WebRTC capable to accomplish with SIP/PSTN requirements. And that is not so bad, but what is really bad is that there is no more. Nobody is proposing things that are currently unfeasible with SIP, so we are limiting the posibilities of WebRTC to those provided by SIP protocol. The vision/scope of WebRTC is currently limited to what SIP provides. I would like to hear proposals that are out of the scope of the pure telephony, but those proposals won't came from telcos (see the "definition" above) since telcos have never succeeded in the Web. >> Soon, they will also ask non mandatory ICE (they will argue "ICE >> mandatory to implement in WebRTC client, but not mandatory to use"). >> DTMF's via RTP is just the less important subject. What I care is all >> the rest, > > But DTMF was the topic of the email. RTP/SRTP is unreliable so sending like-reliable information (DTMF's) over an unreliable stream is, for sure, not the best design. In WebRTC such reliable info could be sent over signaling or over the data-channel (both of them reliable). Why to choose the worst option? reply: to interoperate with existing VoIP protocols. >> and the fact that 75% of mails in this WG are about PSTN >> legacy interoperability. > > No, they're not. 75% might be about SIP-related interoperability, but SIP is not just the PSTN. The SRTP/RTP debate, for example, is not about the PSTN. The SRTP/RTP debate is about interoperability with PSTN or SIP networks, isn't it? The best argument I've read is "upgrading telco's devices is too expensive so plain RTP is desired". SRTP is cheap and easy to implement in a fresh deployment. Mandating SRTP has not the same inplications as mandating HTTPS (server certificates and so) so those arguments about "HTTPS is not mandatory so neither SRTP" are just a good excuse IMHO. >The forking debate is not about the PSTN. The ICE and media consent debates were about both PSTN and Enterprise SIP. The ROAP vs. real API debate was not about the PSTN nor even SIP. The congestion control threads were not either. The TURN URI scheme thread is not about it. The data channel thread is not about it. ... Well, let's see what happens. I still think that we need some crazy pure Web folks in this WG (not too much or we'll have proposals about using port TCP 80 for sending RTP). ;) Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Cameron Byrne
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC José Luis Millán
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC John Elwell
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] SRTP - mandatory to implement vs mandato… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Wolfgang Beck
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Wolfgang Beck
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Wolfgang Beck
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP - mandatory to implement vs man… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Randell Jesup
- [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: Let'… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] surveillance in RTCWEB (was wiretapp… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Cameron Byrne
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Cameron Byrne
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Avasarala, Ranjit
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Avasarala, Ranjit
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Ravindran Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP - mandatory to implement vs man… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP - mandatory to implement vs man… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Olle E. Johansson
- [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Miguel Casas-Sanchez
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Neil Stratford
- [rtcweb] Traffic on the list (Re: Traffic should … Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] Fwd: Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: L… Wolfgang Beck
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Michael Thornburgh
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Matthew Kaufman
- [rtcweb] Media Synchronization (Re: Traffic shoul… Matthew Kaufman
- [rtcweb] DTMF (was Re: Traffic should be encrypte… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Roman Shpount
- [rtcweb] POTS lines to browser (was Re: Fwd: Traf… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] POTS lines to browser (was Re: Fwd: … Wolfgang Beck
- [rtcweb] Call Security (was Re: Let's define the … Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] POTS lines to browser (was Re: Fwd: … Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] POTS lines to browser (was Re: Fwd: … Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Media Synchronization (Re: Traffic s… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Le… Victor Pascual Avila
- Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP requirement - wiretapping (Re: … Cullen Jennings