IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Mon, 14 November 2011 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55EB11E82B4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:37:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.302, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7rl2j-rbrJ1i for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:37:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s4.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s4.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F77211E8198 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:37:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU152-W48 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s4.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:37:27 -0800
Message-ID: <BLU152-W48EC82C844668385C8431493C00@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_61d11205-96fe-478e-bc75-52abb07beaa0_"
X-Originating-IP: [130.129.65.71]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: harald@alvestrand.no
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:37:26 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4EC133F1.8080606@alvestrand.no>
References: <20111031211134.8188.49554.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EAF64FF.8020101@jesup.org> <CAAJUQMhCHHWqeUSKdn4SAS67ohF1y_QxCbc9KcgeybAe7N-5-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3-2ZL5fvsXxGiwjAh3TKe__PGdU+Aw0cR-fGqzT6Ht9g@mail.gmail.com>, <CAAJUQMiyit3QvYJ3piuX26r4T5KtwLwWHX3NaC1wWL-zzeRftA@mail.gmail.com>, <4EC133F1.8080606@alvestrand.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2011 15:37:27.0374 (UTC) FILETIME=[5033A6E0:01CCA2E3]
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:37:32 -0000

> I believe the discussion above bears very little relationship to what 
> has been proposed.  As I read the proposal:

[BA] Yes, that's how I read it as well.  The data channel port/IP address is
determined by offer/answer, so how could it "touch the servers"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email