Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 04 November 2013 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74A021E827A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:36:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.143
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.143 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.833, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ju6npGzWSX2t for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:35:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09FB11E82CA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:35:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b13so2800350wgh.27 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:35:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=JIa9ltEetbIvyjqIq/bc3F1l3SOJCD7hAF3ZFJQRriQ=; b=Pe83KXNk6m0/p0S/46i/6rqvRhKv2C6JRpE84LFV3/79MuBsKQdD+pwc1oxTnGawcP kNAlx1GtOw6DU+IgCcKAkJKguSzJb7nLwLaN7T1/kvK2uaPnzk+tE5DKM4TkFRzALxcY /80nEMBK3K+1lAZ/rC2IhrV8GXo75Ir1F1HTeNKYmAUeVu819SyOaqtGPVqyMbX7YZ4n OWSSs6x1PyJrA/fHULibTdDZtzuIAezSu6kNiKeoOs/JbH6KtqlHNzySIm2XKAQCsne6 ggGGBpKz51qDuGUy+X85fCkDSYW2nwm9LlGapcvSJAqxlQvIQCFOWQe6m4zFIuiSZ2c5 M9Eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlQyyvq/PCwBb4Uv1Q21qK8tPdenfEuX58q21nw1mt+d0MYCTRGNYBaEQKvG5AmObvoX3LR
X-Received: by 10.194.240.41 with SMTP id vx9mr71168wjc.70.1383608152871; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:35:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.152.137 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:35:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:67c:370:176:2dc1:e065:5ec8:3a6c]
In-Reply-To: <BLU169-W5564795A82C4385F7DD58F93F60@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU169-W5564795A82C4385F7DD58F93F60@phx.gbl>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:35:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPPSZFURAerm5T5EERJOq7yN9Z6nKyzdjFPq+xRNtP9Zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c28dcc75e9eb04ea626032
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:36:02 -0000

I haven't updated the documents at all.

Yes, I am a bad person.

-Ekr



On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>wrote;wrote:

> At IETF 87 we had a discussion of SRTP/SDES.  In looking at the most
> recent version of several documents, I didn't see the consensus of that
> discussion reflected.  Was that because the consensus in the room wasn't
> verified on the list, or some other reason?  Or maybe I missed the text
> somewhere?  Here is what seemingly relates to this topic:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07 Section
> 5.5:
>
>    [OPEN ISSUE:  What should the settings be here?  MUST?]
>    Implementations MAY support SDES for media traffic for backward
>    compatibility purposes.
>
> [BA] As I recall, the room consensus was MUST NOT with respect to
> SRTP/SDES, no?
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security
>
> [BA] Nothing related to key management (which seems fine).
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage
>
> [BA]  The security and security-architecture documents are referenced
> normatively in Section 13 Security Considerations (which seems fine).
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>