Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-02: Clone comments
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 04 October 2012 11:32 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C758321F8661 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 04:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cALSwlPP3dIJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 04:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAD721F85A1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 04:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB9F39E0FE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:32:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TmNOcrQ6uOys for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:32:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:1043:1:be30:5bff:fede:bcdc]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2631E39E062 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:32:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <506D73CF.80701@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:32:31 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340A7BCD49@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340A7BCD49@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030403090000030705020607"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-02: Clone comments
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:32:35 -0000
On 10/04/2012 01:25 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > Hi, > > A couple of comments on the cloning stuff in JSEP: > > Q1. The document doesn't say how the cloning is performed. If that is > outside the scope of JSEP, and belongs to the W3C API spec, I think it > should be mentioned. > > Q2. The text in section 4.7.2 says: > > "As a result of this cloning, the application will end > up with N > > parallel sessions, each with a local and remote > description and their > > own local and remote addresses." > > I think the "own local addresses" wording is a little misleading, as > each clone will share the same local address. > Not sure what to say here. I can see multiple ways to implement this - some will end up with different local ports, some won't. If the non-local (reflexive?) candidates are allocated using STUN on a per-port basis, addresses could be different too.
- [rtcweb] JSEP-02: Clone comments Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-02: Clone comments Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-02: Clone comments Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-02: Clone comments Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-02: Clone comments Justin Uberti