Re: [rtcweb] Use case for smellovision

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Sat, 06 April 2013 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143A921F968A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 21:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUdXYYE5uZaE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 21:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8048C21F967F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D4FC406D9; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 22:16:30 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <515F9F4C.8000604@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:06:36 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
References: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113446D3F@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <8DFF2C41-FA67-4BB6-B4EB-784CEC2D0DFE@edvina.net> <CAMRcRGSVKpk_8u=g2W3dxhV6LinJDvO3AZgnnSn+koRLQrf18g@mail.gmail.com> <002b01ce3089$a36a0450$ea3e0cf0$@shockey.us> <515F278A.5070102@alum.mit.edu> <CAMRcRGSOg7wvhUfis+VdYbpU=F9cpG+vwgWBRMvPo4rcrGSNjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRcRGSOg7wvhUfis+VdYbpU=F9cpG+vwgWBRMvPo4rcrGSNjw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use case for smellovision
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 04:06:41 -0000

Clearly the IETF community lacks the expertise to judge the quality of
olfactory codecs. Tests of perceived fidelity ought to be left up to the
experts, i.e., dogs. This would give new meaning to MUSH[ra] testing.

On 4/5/13 9:53 PM, Suhas Nandakumar wrote:
> Do we need an encoder and decoder  .. I think JSON encapsulated binary
> representation of smell is just enough....
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Time to start the competition for the mandatory to implement smellovision
>> codec.
>>
>>
>> On 4/4/13 12:38 AM, Richard Shockey wrote:
>>
>>> What are the Intellectual Property Issues with smell-0-vision?  Is there
>>> a patent pool here?
>>>
>>> Obviously you need to find out that first before you can define a use
>>> case.
>>>
>>> *From:*rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.**org<rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org>]
>>> *On
>>> Behalf Of *Suhas Nandakumar
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:40 AM
>>> *To:* Olle E. Johansson
>>> *Cc:* Cullen Jennings (fluffy); rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] Use case for smellovision
>>>
>>>
>>> I think such an application can be embedded in the rtcweb-sensors
>>> attached to the sniff dogs for real-time big data analysis of smell and
>>> hence help solve the crime -  world peace
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     2 apr 2013 kl. 20:37 skrev "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)"
>>>     <fluffy@cisco.com <javascript:;>>:
>>>
>>>
>>>      >
>>>      > I beilve everything I read on the web, even on April 1, and
>>>     wanted to point out that Googles new search,
>>>      >
>>>      > https://www.google.com/intl/**en/landing/nose/<https://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/nose/>
>>>      >
>>>      > Is going to be critical that webrtc support media types other
>>>     than voice and video.
>>>      >
>>>     I do remember Patrik Fältström's first presentation of Internet
>>>     Media Types - MIME.
>>>     He said that they had attachment types for everything except smell.
>>>
>>>     Time to fix that, obviously.
>>>
>>>     /O
>>>     ______________________________**_________________
>>>     rtcweb mailing list
>>>     rtcweb@ietf.org <javascript:;>
>>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/rtcweb<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>
>>>
>>>
>>>