Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com> Fri, 05 December 2014 11:02 UTC
Return-Path: <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDF81ACE3D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:02:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STMG8A5hbVMt for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 090541ACE30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so590264wgg.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 03:02:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VENDqXTx8G1TmVivoZ7aev1nGqakC3lDlMMb40WKGis=; b=Au8hLPgHsxWHoBoWEZYC9DV0h3uEBoe0Kc+C4pXTn7BkNcwXbjU4rsBKQh8pQaUZ07 aUHbcey/py7MjnLX3FCWAilpldB7dNIdb/Ts4jAKoav88H9u1VhX3ER6tu24/H6UoTIu DWs1MTFpU1XGr9dGm84zYpkGGILvnULzPEzHR+zWphGnVn5YcRvMpJIQlD5ckS05upOD CaiNS2/4GKfLcYkxHWlM2pKo+t08Z7lI/mg7U8Y85Xzkl1CBUa7xv+Lu1IV2W/r3F3Pr 92AdhdxvoNx95RDvg2ldMd/VJzWSJ9wYZc2Fd/bjfQbVP9g0ZQHKwxS/qWsj18l8ihy+ sEqg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.23.10 with SMTP id i10mr22739268wjf.11.1417777340717; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 03:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.76.242 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:02:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D0A78A99.1B183%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <20141204174709.26945.65249.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D0A731B1.1AE1E%rmohanr@cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D57C013@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <D0A78A99.1B183%rmohanr@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:32:20 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKz0y8w720LqX2xRm5AHErXqsppVXhvQym5hZ+hoRyzcPaYxnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
To: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b450b1ec3a17b05097602e5"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/y3WWoCqFF_7n0x-HDRi9hHFTiIA
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:02:25 -0000
Does anyone know if there is a way to get -09 version removed from the datatracker? Muthu On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) <rmohanr@cisco.com> wrote: > Sorry this is a issue w.r.t picking up a wrong version. We had removed > liveness in ver 8. I will check and publish the correct revision. > > Ram > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> > Date: Friday, 5 December 2014 1:52 pm > To: Cisco Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org > > > Subject: RE: [rtcweb] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt > > >Hi, > > > >I thought the idea was to remove the liveness/heartbeat feature, but it > >is still in the draft. > > > >Regards, > > > >Christer > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ram Mohan R > >(rmohanr) > >Sent: 5. joulukuuta 2014 6:19 > >To: rtcweb@ietf.org > >Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: > >draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt > > > >This version addresses all the WGLC comments received. > >Please review and let us know if any thing else is missing. > > > >Regards, > >Authors > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > >Date: Thursday, 4 December 2014 11:17 pm > >To: "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org> > >Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org> > >Subject: [rtcweb] I-D Action: > >draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt > > > >> > >>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >>directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in > >>WEB-browsers Working Group of the IETF. > >> > >> Title : STUN Usage for Consent Freshness > >> Authors : Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal > >> Dan Wing > >> Ram Mohan Ravindranath > >> Tirumaleswar Reddy > >> Martin Thomson > >> Filename : draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt > >> Pages : 9 > >> Date : 2014-12-04 > >> > >>Abstract: > >> To prevent sending excessive traffic to an endpoint, periodic consent > >> needs to be obtained from that remote endpoint. > >> > >> This document describes a consent mechanism using a new Session > >> Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) usage. This same mechanism can > >> also determine connection loss ("liveness") with a remote peer. > >> > >> > >>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshne > >>ss/ > >> > >>There's also a htmlized version available at: > >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09 > >> > >>A diff from the previous version is available at: > >>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshne > >>ss- > >>09 > >> > >> > >>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >>submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > >>tools.ietf.org. > >> > >>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>rtcweb mailing list > >>rtcweb@ietf.org > >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > >_______________________________________________ > >rtcweb mailing list > >rtcweb@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-conse… internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-c… Cullen Jennings (fluffy)