Re: [rtcweb] Requesting a new use case / requirement for draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements

[Iñaki Baz Castillo <[e-mail]>]

2013/7/30 Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>:
> "The conference server must be able to reply a single response accepting the
> offer and indicating the browser all the media tracks from other
> participants it will send to it. This must be possible without requiring a
> new media negotiation round trip, and without requiring that the browser
> knows the number of participants in the conference before contacting it."
>
> is not appropriate for a use case.  It's a proposed constraint on the
> solution, rather than a description of the use.

Hi Ted, I agree that the above is not an use case but a requirement.
But in contrast to what you say, I don't consider it a "constrain".
Instead I consider a constrain the current SDP O/A mandate which does
not let me implementing the above (the opposite is not true).

Should I request a new "requirement" for the draft instead of a new use case?


Best regards.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[e-mail]>