Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability

Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748B921F86D7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 05:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mtvT1JFVjGYk for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 05:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (zimbra.westhawk.co.uk [192.67.4.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA7D21F866E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 05:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.136] (unknown [82.132.219.98]) by zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4412537A905; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:20:38 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <pm9g3f539oh0iyg0y0j4elbn.1344273079260@email.android.com>
From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <pm9g3f539oh0iyg0y0j4elbn.1344273079260@email.android.com>
Message-Id: <81579634-CC55-46FF-8C3B-94EB5019786A@phonefromhere.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:57:39 +0200
To: Alexey Aylarov <alexey@zingaya.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A5355d)
Cc: "Cullen Jennings \(fluffy\)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:11:44 -0000

Ok, the timing is unfortunate, but can you honestly say that we didn't know that this was skype/microsofts opinion? We just chose to ignore it because it was inconvenient. 

Now that it is out there, are we seriously going to ignore a document with _those_ authors from a major browser maker and a team with extensive experience in the field jus because it is late!?!? 

Tim, speaking for himself. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 6 Aug 2012, at 19:11, Alexey Aylarov <alexey@zingaya.com> wrote:

> It was easy to expect from company which tries to build its own standards all the time instead of team work on open technologies. If they want to live in their own universe - it's their choice. We need to continue team work on the future of open web communications.
> 
> "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I see that Microsoft decided to wait until the W3C and IETF were close to done before putting together a proposal that, if accepted, would explode most the current works and create maximal delay on this work. 
>> 
>> http://blogs.skype.com/en/2012/08/customizable_ubiquitous_real_t.html
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb