Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 26 June 2013 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6172211E8167 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eQhyNhZGzIf for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1535511E8155 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so2546784wib.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=I1bzBJ7vMwIh5UG59whqJ60oHrTEnU1XL+3ylsU3viY=; b=C6WDYEydnXQpigar1jOwwH074l7K69QxUxTtScR0VNCT2cDxliH0sj5oY/dELuzQvV UyZ201y7cg8i1e7ycyy6pXqlufLCtExC5rpzSVpdpSTunHcvlPf19D4hABd/B0Rm0CRv SvQc0MUgwH3SXDf+O5r9ZTQkfHA9/NQfW4yZLkSNn5b0baG4DGZ664k/Zp7v9Iw1IzUk m2NU43po/Enyc3B9v81ZL5ui86pd4fowbZl1uzLbFR4FcL0eqLwEVd92BW4w9uTobZhH 46sF/pmUWyj/Nj/J/TuDXmMc+ALK8yrBxKacoeHULEZ8zxYs5FmFOWon6TV94A/DxnVc rLiw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.110 with SMTP id a14mr4364517wjx.84.1372290844707; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUFGj0hU1gHptFkPMCUu_idCxh8uyJ2=67g-P8a9DHD1Cw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5158F0FC.3070104@jesup.org> <39821B4C400EC14DAD4DB25330A9271A02B56F@FR711WXCHMBA02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <5165CF9D.6030302@jesup.org> <FC4978CB-360E-4F47-9A31-941121589E8A@ag-projects.com> <CAN2PU+4MWZQSY=VVwNpyjEnV3aHB1zLgwuRyOYiOm_nTcEL6ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <782A8339-9A9D-49AE-85E6-9FAD55436807@tokbox.com> <CAJrXDUFGj0hU1gHptFkPMCUu_idCxh8uyJ2=67g-P8a9DHD1Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:54:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV8p4c2iJuOe6FVz+cfB5qsnrMKXxnmXvop0SO1TK4BPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:54:08 -0000

On 26 June 2013 16:46, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>; wrote:
> You know you're in trouble when CU-RTC-Web is considered "much more simple"
> :).

When you are comparing to SDP O/A, pigs start looking like princesses.

> how could you test such a thing, without a working implementation of CU-RTC-Web?

http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/prototypes/cu-rtc-web-roaming/cu-rtc-web-roaming/info

Surely that's enough to build a proof of concept application.  I'm not
claiming that it's glamorous, far from it, there's some atrocious code
in there, but it's not a complete vacuum.