IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-11: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 07 March 2019 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2F91312BB; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 17:27:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RiSXK3LCNLH; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 17:27:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C878B1312C2; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 17:27:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bens-macbook.lan (cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x271RXkv038440 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:27:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1551922056; bh=fzYT0VYkTSRRr5sQo9+UJspYoixoT+bgtgV2HcuW22U=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=tWIS8U1ZqJXGuoDpfMD2JnKEn8oNox2IYbBFrhy2St4tJ8mUbvFvyb8Rmbo7CakeK yVeU/9ZKe986jRiN91ojMycGUE1fZuf9HvcMnAo7kERRfMLyJqOsPrGApuQ4VaVl52 1a3c5ayfIF3AtHwhTW3/1GZDelUW4IrqIYNJ/zyA=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105] claimed to be bens-macbook.lan
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <D77B389E-45B7-43D0-9299-5B2940D5089B@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A7F16BE8-EC74-4618-B00C-17C227F053BD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 19:27:26 -0600
In-Reply-To: <9BA0FDE6-B690-4EF1-8530-4DBAC514B32F@sn3rd.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-security@ietf.org, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, rtcweb@ietf.org
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
References: <155175814957.5184.10462812445955598264.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9BA0FDE6-B690-4EF1-8530-4DBAC514B32F@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/yB_8BEMhO68YnPf1Ltqzk90pqqo>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 01:27:38 -0000

Thanks!

Ben.

> On Mar 6, 2019, at 7:03 PM, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 5, 2019, at 12:55, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-11: Yes
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> I disagree that this should be informative. It does have sections that have
>> informational content, but it also has sections that serve as security
>> considerations for WebRTC as a whole.
>> 
>> (nit) §4.2.1: Please expand ICE on first mention.
> 
> https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/security/pull/15
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email