Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

On 12/16/14 13:33, David Singer wrote:
> Except I can’t find the text “non-browser” in the referenced document.

Huh. I see the following (cf. 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-13#section-2.2>):

>     o  A WebRTC non-browser is something that conforms to the protocol
>        specification, but does not claim to implement the Javascript API.
>        This can also be called a "WebRTC device" or "WebRTC native
>        application".


In terms of the text you cited about the relationship between terms, 
which is an outdated version of:
>     All WebRTC browsers are WebRTC endpoints, so any requirement on a
>     WebRTC endpoint also applies to a WebRTC browser.

If you think you see somewhere that we're imposing a requirement on an 
endpoint that doesn't *also* apply to a browser, please call it out 
explicitly.

If this is some oblique attempt to complain about the reference to the 
-12 version of the overview document [1]  by pretending to be daft [2]: 
you're not fooling anyone, so you can stop it. You may be misguided, but 
we all know that you're not stupid.

/a

____
[1] Rather than the -13 version that came out three days after *this* 
document
[2] As you did with the "Brower" typo