Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> Fri, 19 July 2013 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C568221E80AA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 03:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.492
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.193, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zPjWj7EJVtiV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 03:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3D721E8095 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 03:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7f456d000002e83-cb-51e915aa5ae3
Received: from ESESSHC013.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 27.20.11907.AA519E15; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:32:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.6]) by ESESSHC013.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.57]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:32:10 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Stefan_H=E5kansson_LK?= <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
To: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
Thread-Index: AQHOg8lDQU4UZHPk70iYDIx2uADXhg==
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:32:09 +0000
Message-ID: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C31A9AA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CD1E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <BLU401-EAS386F88B3FE140492B39B59693610@phx.gbl> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484213E41E7@TK5EX14MBXC265.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CAJrXDUHHVfyE2bCaQu3pR4F=XHvEp64xMwwdRy586FkrOjO3dw@mail.gmail.com>, <CABkgnnXE3mzb=TmiMBWGPwux2vZo3VL14yrQLyPT72hs74b1JA@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4842371513C@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.148]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre5q0ZeBBvOW8lpcO/OP0WLGrbMs FteWv2a16P24hNFi7b92dgdWj52z7rJ7LNhU6rFkyU8mj1sPJrF5HJ23nzWANYrLJiU1J7Ms tUjfLoEro/n9dNaCYyIVu188Z21g7BHsYuTkkBAwkTj67hIzhC0mceHeejYQW0jgKKPE1bXK XYxcQPYiRonrezaDFbEJBEps3bcArEhEwFKi+9kbdpAiZoF1jBIXm3azgySEBaoklh8+BmRz ABVVSyzpL4eo15OYeqMHbA6LgKrE+81LWEBsXgFfif139zFBLHvPLtG7/S3YHEagi76fWsME YjMLiEvcejKfCeJSAYkle85DXS0q8fLxP1YIW0micckTVoh6PYkbU6ewQdjaEssWvmaGWCYo cXLmE5YJjKKzkIydhaRlFpKWWUhaFjCyrGLkKE4tTspNNzLYxAiMpINbflvsYLz81+YQozQH i5I47xa9M4FCAumJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5qcWHGJk4OKUaGFn//HRv5Hgi2qtxf3XU1dj8R9yl PZZ7bf8+8M7Z/1M/szE2yWnW/XJLwSPOc59dZ+vdYFSyhsF37oM1ay7JfTdrmuZ1+oDDgjKJ yfGtu1aK7Xj+kzX9eYVw8yez8sNBsgcsdt6etDpb5MqdjqXLZGTPdhaxvf7evYjlcIrbmYsm Grs/Z9v8PKnEUpyRaKjFXFScCABjF8E6cgIAAA==
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:32:17 -0000

On 7/19/13 12:40 AM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) wrote:
> Thanks for digging this up... in the meantime of course there's been
> work ongoing in the MMUSIC IETF WG that adds even more questions than
> it answers. See messages from as recent as today about msid, bundle,
> "unified plan", etc. (All useful work that is needed for other types
> of SDP-using applications, like SIP-based videoconferencing systems,
> but work that will take some time and which as long as we stick with
> SDP as an API will be holding up the WEBRTC specification)
>
> As long as it is allowed for the SDP to be modified between
> createOffer and setLocalDescription, there must be a W3C
> specification instructing browser vendors as to what changes are and
> are not allowed.

Perhaps we should, at least initially, consider Martin's proposal: 
modifications are not allowed between createX and setLocal.

>
> Or, as I've pointed out before, we could define a browser API that is
> entirely independent of SDP, and allow enough control that JavaScript
> programmers can arrange objects and set their parameters such that
> useful SRTP media streams can be sent and received, and then they can
> write whatever JavaScript they want to create the SDP that is getting
> defined over in MMUSIC and other places, or not use those specs if
> they so desire.
>
> Matthew Kaufman
>
> ________________________________________ From: Martin Thomson
> [martin.thomson@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:53 AM To:
> Peter Thatcher Cc: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE); <rtcweb@ietf.org>;;
> public-webrtc@w3.org Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application
> Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control
> surface
>
> On 18 July 2013 08:12, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>; wrote:
>> I believe I began paying attention to the mailing lists after you
>> sent out theses slides that you didn't present.  I'm interested in
>> seeing them, and while I could dig through archives to find them,
>> if convenient, could you please give me a link to the slides?
>> Thanks.
>
> It wasn't actually November, it was October, which made this harder
> to find than I had expected.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Oct/0148.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>