IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Thu, 21 August 2014 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9E21A049E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HZyA3Qb-RvDM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com (mail-we0-f176.google.com [74.125.82.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DFA31A04A7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q58so9693041wes.21 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zXDbm95Sxr5BwliNPkW0cFN+NCoulaCLCGFJ4SZz0Ug=; b=KWWeaxAwzAXYq7EtaGKCdBBbqniaVbmVyeGBbCJJPC8I5UOwZUTjrsW36rZkHs9/vE 4no62+7hkfLcV9v5Jx4R+zUmK3v8OnvyLL6r81jZaT5lw8VZLMbA0Pio3W88ql5xchs2 FDQVFdmPMSIg1Tl5o+xqXqBUqSPRXgg4IFIMESGDsZCyp71F11nFmBPRLeAnayEPCd8N aYqGdL7UfbI2ynIfV2vMn+dlippu0XIVy3vWpyuuqsMfIjfFKaXxrOXza6XcbvgBtizP dGxbpGyz6agyHUnJuJ3yl3c9vgBfJBVDKhIQ72xjVRjYFnhE6bL/v8VmGsm5Peg98Erf ceGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk4ymL0A5fSSiPq2FnUDwemMZ5etsLGuBXOU7kRJrLnsZoTsb7R+mj0c+ShEx2G3NWHLsW1
X-Received: by 10.194.205.129 with SMTP id lg1mr151427wjc.97.1408645533792; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ez1sm22421762wib.15.2014.08.21.11.25.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w61so9756616wes.37 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.74.42 with SMTP id q10mr5959092wiv.39.1408645532710; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.20.7 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUnfB5bskH4zWRfBMdHbSoqftV5Fo_GEXoLt9XCH9Tt_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCZT1XW4LLaJ4Nq2DbrxD59cYnjLo5JXn9fjEb8pyamaQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D41CDC3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAKz0y8zycsyr9m4BA=-8xOaWkU+Sog5Mbz7K-oN3woqi++mVzg@mail.gmail.com> <53F451CF.10705@alvestrand.no> <001b01cfbc94$fccd5310$f667f930$@co.in> <CAKz0y8zNM3rc3XC6JqrK+d4hXiT5TomhNM+W2twg0+-83-pFow@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUnfB5bskH4zWRfBMdHbSoqftV5Fo_GEXoLt9XCH9Tt_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:25:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxsT9Vdm0=tjk9WsLAH4ekbAizgyjm--168TrOf8UAYGZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c80d6978201050127d894"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ypNrbxpFPrzjxvs_7Lj1K5CH1-A
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:25:40 -0000

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 20 August 2014 21:16, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The elementary entity that needs to perform consent is a WebRTC entity
> that
> > runs untrusted applications -- essentially a WebRTC browser.
>
> That is incorrect.  Any entity that receives peer transport
> information from elsewhere needs to perform consent.
>
>
All entities receive peer transport information from elsewhere, including
gateways running ICE-Lite. Does it mean all of them need to perform consent?

Generally it would be trivial to use any public VoIP service to force it to
send RTP traffic anywhere. It is not like this is a new problem.
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email