Re: [rtcweb] Basic scenario 'impossible?' to achieve with the actual API

When the JS calls setRemote with the response (which rejects the video), the UA will know that the video has been rejected.  Is the idea that the UA will let the user know via the chrome?  Do we think it is the JS applications job to notify the user of success/failure, or the UA's?  I don't recall a discussion of this.

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:48 PM
To: Enrico Marocco
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Basic scenario 'impossible?' to achieve with the actual API

2013/7/2 Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>:
> Audio-only call establishment:
>
> A --{"action":"CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B B --{"action":"ACCEPT 
> CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> A
>
> Rejected audio+video upgrade proposal:
>
> A --{"action":"UPGRADE","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B B --{"action":"REJECT 
> UPGRADE"}-> A

SDP itself is a media negotiation protocol so SDP (and its WebRTC
"API") should provide a way to determine whether the remote has accepted or not our new stream/track. But how? Current API lacks any kind of event for the case in which the remote replies a SDP rejecting our new local strem/track.

--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb