Re: [rtcweb] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-11

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 06 March 2019 23:57 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AE71274D0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:57:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lcN_9HRX-8Y for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:57:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C661310F7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id x3so11852839ior.6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:57:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ojoD2laanefPYNo91m1ZSxGvJvETtgtQvp/x1iVjMj0=; b=gFXFna4XVL1nri0xfSO+h2QZA6C4QDDNsLEKjTeumhXLaWalHjrFq642r8B1TTfgJj 7T0yL2oSGQXo506m2/MG15Ff24Te6FqlTXwHAxwE/nvHjTgBQZMLur5ROowTocVAl3fR cNUugS3GS4IhbMfIez742A/Mwf1bWxs40yC3PqmLOg9FPmL/KLX+8xZYuTPKWBhiGE5b H3/zTX77kwisNjLFw5ApIOi5F9L9PWeSVs6zm+UWVo5Vh2KSzItBEp8kPAXxb+x4ka0R BrPmAvgABb+Th7h6mCwpBA8mt/iTKagnu+E2lSTlo/J/zuuhsoRSeTlLbL8GgoocAw3D ijNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ojoD2laanefPYNo91m1ZSxGvJvETtgtQvp/x1iVjMj0=; b=fOdBLLdyuFBPtItOy5JzYcCsvErbveBdariZUa0p3HbAueHcWS4367FIG4NnbH8MMC KkpqrwiVnXWjRbVXgAXYEyHXxx6raF5wh4dlgp22en63HZWvZlrcZN9Zg1ArH+ilDeYo XReP66s8tpq7fmjpE9yeNeywM9Cb3fYV6wFKecLmkJ/8usNxHe9AuUwpGPk6x4hPv3B3 dY1OkvHPU+HcXBjM4rm2OJHazuwjj7qnX+1c5+j+j25x4UcFAz9WvodCceDm8JpHN5Fx +xwQcFcuscpodpho0Bo1dNzZ08oP3q2Q3yv/gU20irvxGjKFBq5uHmtGAA6oWNVpc8u7 ilhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlY4g9L+DCTMp8SZH4LNHhZxYHp/cBlApJ/sClgDqpDvnCS1mI SwyTBfo7dZxwhi3Z3fczsc6cD8fhvqnxLUYfbGT0sA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz/JDT0oe97ZynvHWl4rnsEs6n4p/K4FcqDkZARiqBUC/76NM1jvUKxvST6zJCbY9rKy3coXwX2IKuTyu1jLtw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:df01:: with SMTP id f1mr4735033ioq.101.1551916676001; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:57:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155042612497.4083.2465692313767522646@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOJ7v-3Ue2oDCLiF8QK6i2f18-=pc+ADkeQDJL6TfH=5Wayeaw@mail.gmail.com> <7214C146-4B65-429E-AA90-4ED9E2654472@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <7214C146-4B65-429E-AA90-4ED9E2654472@strayalpha.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:57:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3ZXyWKiWpGTta0=fXc+30mkhkd78hw-H0kZG6zGfOUkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: tsv-art@ietf.org, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000321426058375c2ca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/zBGp0yc-guN0msNrIlge7_Sebl4>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-11
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 23:58:00 -0000

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:33 PM Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>; wrote:

> You could just add “Unix” or “Unix-like” to before “connect”, or refer to
> these calls as “bind()” and “connect()”.
>
> It is important that these are the semantics of Unix-like sockets; other
> APIs may not have a corresponding mechanism. Further, the UDP source
> address might change later (i.e., in TCP the “connect” always forces a
> static source IP address selected at the initiation of the TCP connection;
> in UDP, there’s no need for this to happen only once at the time the
> “connect()” is issued.
>

Sounds good.