Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com> Thu, 30 August 2012 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4910A21F860B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WLs7DZ21XG8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx1.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C885C21F8575 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.197] (LRouen-152-83-11-227.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.13.74.227]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx1.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27126F25B8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <503FBFB8.30509@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:32:08 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120625 SeaMonkey/2.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <9E2843EA-EBB9-40B3-898C-6B5216FAE7A5@cisco.com> <CABRok6kSU9RFQo5GEQqtSRi2dTPV3fCN2MERfSQKorH1Hnbh4w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABRok6kSU9RFQo5GEQqtSRi2dTPV3fCN2MERfSQKorH1Hnbh4w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:32:13 -0000

Neil Stratford wrote:
> G.711 alone does not meet the rtcweb goal of producing a viable
> alternative to browser plugins as it will be impossible for an
> application developer to guarantee an acceptable audio quality
> (defined as at least as good as when using plugins) for browser to
> browser calls.

And, for those who do not know, this is what plugins are capable of 
today: https://plus.google.com/u/0/117107600391040942348/posts/ZYw4j21RjUL