Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb

[Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Matthew Kaufman <[e-mail]> wrote:

> O
>
>> Yes, some gateway scenarios might be cheaper/easier with SDES, but I see
>> the primary use-cases for WebRTC to be browser-to-browser, not
>> browser-legacy.
>>
>
> Just because the charter was mistakenly written that way doesn't mean it
> is true.
>

I remind you that the actual title of the group is:

"Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb)".  While you may disagree
with the charter, please remember that it's not fundamentally a prediction
about what the eventual balance of flows will be.  It's a statement about
where the balance of effort in the group should go.   To me as an
individual, it implies that we should not make trade-offs that optimize a
non-browser use case at the expense of the browser use case except in
pretty extraordinary circumstances.

regards,

Ted Hardie