[rtcweb] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-05: (with COMMENT)

["Spencer Dawkins" <[e-mail]>]

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-05: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-video/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for producing this document. I'm only mildly familiar with this
level of detail, and the document was clear, with pointers when I needed
them. I'm honored to ballot Yes.

I did have one question. In this text:

   Implementations MAY send and act upon "User data registered by Rec.
   ITU-T T.35" and "User data unregistered" messages.  Even if they do
   not act on them, implementations MUST be prepared to receive such
   messages without any ill effects.

Is that a usual thing to say? Perhaps it is, but I thought that might be
understood.