From nobody Thu Dec 2 02:33:11 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F983A0FD5 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 02:33:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lyZJkunYXZgq for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 02:33:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-il1-x129.google.com (mail-il1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB7753A0FD4 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 02:33:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x129.google.com with SMTP id i9so28418210ilu.1 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 02:33:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PcSGSMR8jYB4GM0mkubea5L1LNrquYpQoBQ/qCGFft8=; b=KjHw0uOiP+tCWCVpEl+dv628XMdw0ufHnqVA8E9iwCOw+cOVl3LSBvWShMFsLxsSYM 8J1tTX8QP7cEOJ6YCFtlKnQ6EPMwmIEEhaDHd5LK/p0k7bsHGUHVUwFlgU+mVUJXC7y6 QJvd66MkqlVNiJQMptk48+SuFplWH5XtlCbyHDF5iMGJ6NGe9AgrEUHnxF3h8NZxj+fR 4x6DB8ImaxsBXR702BJGH/RME+V1owoffxY9myhIqsHKeISs76svKEQn3F3vp8jNoFDM saIl/bZXPExPXJbU+rbkfxSkXceX8yvqNEGEv5qZWHkqSCb6KJt/BK7pf6TMX8HaOIxI eQGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PcSGSMR8jYB4GM0mkubea5L1LNrquYpQoBQ/qCGFft8=; b=ww7wRqfZesNlMN8HOy2Ebq4LxI9iCWc88zC99K0RwLMAfodDZ3Exw+0qkRCj5+C5J+ SKCj7LxX/Dz5+Wf7bmfKBOJRo3mnF5dDHt9ddYQDgp3GF2fqGLFpZjry9UthUzW9G2fH 9tgtw5IwtxO+t88V4tRZQx6oHzNPnc+4DSV61tZbxyzVEwMq6voTKyzdiTOskX8BKcWc dXS3l0q2kSIEei2CcME37B6H0k1EmBl5TcRrmUmXSd1F+uhzK7cnsbm7o3t3wLviLaHB mkrc6YUhtKy5RqeVhOCgq2hCuRY9IOrM+8UWf94R12kpFDAT84v0YU4hpfx1zhWG+oum 6+yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xJaRn2v8NQSJ5UwEqq6DT+9SwqRpEeH7vfVnFwpcKxnTDAdPi v7dqpfuSHSD+YZ0r78dndLwZAaSG4GKxMycBVRBPemsJoCI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdcQS1Q7eFqzklENKvkzwdxNf6ZYnM9a8k5PJoHjE8hHDRdPGq61tq44qh0czLsdHrEbB68BcywM8z3iu49Lc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:19c6:: with SMTP id r6mr14308153ill.99.1638441182949; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 02:33:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ted Hardie Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:32:36 +0000 Message-ID: To: RTCWeb IETF , Justin Uberti , Cullen Jennings , Eric Rescorla , Sean Turner Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b1f3f305d2275060" Archived-At: Subject: [rtcweb] Working group last call X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 10:33:09 -0000 --000000000000b1f3f305d2275060 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Howdy, The working group last for draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-01.txt. The first issue raised was related to the references, adding a reference to 8843-bis (this would be auto-upgraded to the RFC number by the RFC Editor in final editing, provided the version listed is the one that becomes the RFC). The second issue was related to third-party call control. The conversation among Justin, Christer, Roman, appears to have converged on a change to 8843-bis, to update the SIP considerations section to a 3PCC consideration section (Section 7.6). RFC 8829bis will then reference that text. Unless there are other issues to be raised, I believe that these changes can be made the the document progressed to IETF last call. regards, Ted --000000000000b1f3f305d2275060 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How= dy,

<= div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:large">The working group las= t for draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-01.txt.=C2=A0 The first issue raised w= as related to the references, adding a reference to 8843-bis (this would be= auto-upgraded to the RFC number by the RFC Editor in final editing, provid= ed the version listed is the one that becomes the RFC).

The second issue was related to third-p= arty call control.=C2=A0 The conversation among Justin, Christer, Roman, ap= pears to have converged on a change to 8843-bis, to update the SIP consider= ations section to a 3PCC consideration section (Section 7.6).=C2=A0=C2=A0 R= FC 8829bis will then reference that text.

Unless there are other issues to be raised, I believe that= these changes can be made the the document progressed to IETF last call.

regards,

Ted
--000000000000b1f3f305d2275060--