Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Balwant Bisht <balwant.bisht@gmail.com> Fri, 13 April 2018 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <balwant.bisht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2944412D7F9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 01:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CsL3phkIcXBd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 01:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 178DD1241FC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 01:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w2so6078335wmw.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 01:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a97n4shaxkM+l+DeqbeHbgz8bndYSMBed4HCIQ9RH0U=; b=sFZSj4jQxZlx51CXirzMqNbnNC/62ch2/igOwCOUHxcfMG3t/fqZ3ZstOWJQffyQhb JXW/J77QgWzAvSUitxor4Lxafs7jTN4sVP0qQtkWmjzykCiuCPf7nUjpfgGw9uFHcIks amFtnKoq5epSHlxyO6kyjcuhcmp5ftrre7r1AifnSMecMZ9FBBq9mQE7RoKIJ9DlvJJb xDQyJ5/kvHZm6gp0/9wwHRTuJQqO2+sWsAwXoa/tTfd6g5/byhrRoUAHfs1ovfkh7UeA hR9aGTE7v4ffNRPoNhJiKpfF03LjvfaNfoQH92hIqxZDMS97CTQH8cPOh7h7QkbfmNej /OXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a97n4shaxkM+l+DeqbeHbgz8bndYSMBed4HCIQ9RH0U=; b=WrhuNQD1ScDmka46iqY0vVQVpL/Q4RQRmr0Exk5IUP1Isggg83JNnkmCJrOAvCoIqU x+0MIBkCx6V9I1qwDqg8kztXNoBBsoNt4SI3t6WX3zSvp1IaZzlvnqBt/qiS8VUPg2Cz iOenF1eXXAZ+1SJwF4Oqf2T8O7b6lIGxwhwYUUdF4eparbtTkzUUsAypNLH7EVqmB7rg /HQnSq6yuY1p1NdJIRKEoerkEF5l4Y8Zr/yYxM/wW9of3oBv00pCAw/4qtY/FAU9YH08 QSUpWf55i1goRYLW4x+Xw2W/EFNxGJOj5o5f9kNInqU5g0GCVIs8/6+hvGtHChiEVp9o ytbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCUJOl2GJWEFhEfqdagzx0CcYS7XUxUf4GmMYgQICnXC57gn43E xNKtUMDmOb5/IWVlPwor0HFwBTpEcAFbBd3yJVMIlg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx481u/A+S4yeBJNZKCZuUWwAPnE0KU9MwkfuLgYxq6EjoDaHzKoM+CxfiinvG1NUAOoVvzuqE/EGFNapwtGn/SA=
X-Received: by 10.80.170.29 with SMTP id o29mr18687465edc.74.1523607816532; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 01:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.184.161 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 01:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4902F7BF-0D20-4EA6-9E78-D22C90EFCE22@westhawk.co.uk>
References: <1D5B431C-801E-4F8C-8026-6BCBB72FF478@sn3rd.com> <63282b84-4493-3fcb-a95f-4afe17d96bb6@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOJ7v-1gTq+EEjb+-q-T-pABBW--rpNGegoj_d2_7f7AKGksCA@mail.gmail.com> <403713b4-31d4-9085-d639-d3f60935ed5a@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOJ7v-0ED-FK=JmSxBJYfM=PCdgY6kmbiq6aFLcP7OXugG07EA@mail.gmail.com> <e6938f7d-542d-736b-0a3d-9269d7dd06e5@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOW+2dv1ORz2tEkgDTvdM1DtgyOdgXqKU30T4QhLAp1NT+rirg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0tCcg3FdzyfSJ6Y3JaH-TivFf-Sey6+tD8BANJKsjqtQ@mail.gmail.com> <1fceb3c4-35f3-34f7-de1d-79d5805e6d22@gmail.com> <9517D601-D3E8-46E1-94E5-7EC29FD6319B@sn3rd.com> <b5d323ac-2205-2aee-05c9-f270e80215f5@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0+hr-NddbLCwgjkfyEFEzoLYW8BcE5OYZ+HUiqDRnarg@mail.gmail.com> <0dee004d-159a-a9be-a0b8-ecbfd4204d72@gmail.com> <06252a76-f12e-4d8d-4a07-5240a7605bce@gmail.com> <914e0220-e3cc-00d7-0925-e5deb8b07e75@nostrum.com> <AFDFD3F3-4798-4716-B26C-A67457BF2C65@sn3rd.com> <e5e2a517-d29a-117c-ab79-6f01fa62b843@gmail.com> <20180412144158.44733ac7@lminiero> <b767da79-7678-2a1c-ecb0-46a9a3bd9129@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2gmxpsGp=25pcJmnkYmipZdCFOqU4nLtAVSznLsZo9rQ@mail.gmail.com> <4902F7BF-0D20-4EA6-9E78-D22C90EFCE22@westhawk.co.uk>
From: Balwant Bisht <balwant.bisht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:53:16 +0530
Message-ID: <CABZ311B4RT04ekpxrEVeXfr3wXrZqT8UxvNj2W7p=xfozBSp-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Cc: Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0ddc0cae77860569b696cb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/zyNhkJasyrf3BIsoBa1bXPeyxFE>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:23:41 -0000

Also what will happen when user have disabled camera & microphone on his
system, don't have any or G Suite Admin have disabled devices on Chromebook
and user just want to see a live event (webinar, baby cam etc).

Regards
Balwant Bisht


On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:29 PM, westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
> > On 13 Apr 2018, at 02:22, Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.
> ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Being non-interactive, it's not clear that those cases require Mode 1
> though; they should work well even in Mode 2. I also don't think that
> suggesting "more appropriate means" is useful when we as a WG haven't been
> able to come up with any.
>
> Whoa there! Non interactive, that’s a big step from non-conversational !
> So one current use-case is adjusting room lights over the data channel.
> You can literally see latency - an unnecessary cloud round-trip is entirely
> visible.
>
> Another is driving a droid over the datachannel using it’s camera to feed
> live video to see where it is going
> - again totally interactive, just not using local media at the user’s end
> (although we do use the
> motion sensors to give a steering wheel feel) - latency here causes
> crashes!
>
> A third one is baby cams, where again the video feed is one-way but you’d
> really like to keep the media on the home wifi
> if possible for cost (and privacy) reasons.
>
> In all these I’ll have to introduce an otherwise needless GUM request to
> get the network behaviour I want.
>
> Perhaps I should present some of these non-call based usecases at a future
> F2F so that folks get a sense of the possibilities.
>
> Tim.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>