答复: Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August, 2020)

qinfengwei <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com> Wed, 12 August 2020 06:27 UTC

Return-Path: <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934B43A1086; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 23:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pXb6bJxgOoT5; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 23:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEF63A1088; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 23:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.17]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app11-12011 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eeb5f338bb833c-345e3; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:27:04 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eeb5f338bb833c-345e3
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[223.69.29.68]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee95f338bb6e2c-1d35d; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:27:04 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee95f338bb6e2c-1d35d
From: "qinfengwei" <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>
To: <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org>, <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
References: <03dc01d66f26$b1891600$149b4200$@com>
In-Reply-To: <03dc01d66f26$b1891600$149b4200$@com>
Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogQWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQtY3ctYmZkLXVuYQ==?= =?gb2312?B?ZmZpbGlhdGVkLWVjaG8gKGVuZGluZyAxNiBBdWd1c3QsIDIwMjAp?=
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:27:04 +0800
Message-ID: <018d01d67071$99672f20$cc358d60$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdZqX9arTYmclvY3Rqa9ix5ZVgAjygExmg8QAFK7i/A=
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/-kVUcLNkL1t4t62FbCIayOvG9SE>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:27:22 -0000

Hi,
	I support the adoption of the draft.


Thanks,
Fengwei Qin


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Jeffrey Haas
发送时间: 2020年8月4日 21:16
收件人: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
主题: Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August,
2020)

Working Group,

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/

At the virtual IETF 108, Unaffiliated BFD Echo Function was presented.  This
is a followup of a presentation given at IETF 106.

The authors have indicated they would like to have this work adopted by the
BFD WG.  This begins the adoption call ending August 16.  Please respond to
the mailing list with your thoughts on this adoption.

It should be noted that this document overlaps work in the Broadband Forum
(BBF) document TR-146.  As noted in the presentation, the BBF document lacks
some clarity and also doesn't discuss interactions with BFD implementations.
This draft has good clarifications with regard to implementations of this
mechanism when the a BFD Echo-capable implementation is used.

This raises two points to consider as part of adoption:
- This document with its current goals would Update RFC 5880.
- The status of this document would need to be Proposed Standard.

-- Jeff