Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8

[Marc Binderberger <[e-mail]>]

Hello Carlos,

ah thanks!  Okay, RFC 5342 is now RFC 7042 and I have a reference to 
it, to silence idnit (gee, it's just an informational reference! ...) :

----snip----snap----snip----snap----
7.  IANA Considerations

   IANA assigned a dedicated MAC address 01-00-5E-90-00-01 (see
   [RFC7042]) as well as UDP port 6784 for UDP encapsulated micro BFD
   sessions.
----snip----snap----snip----snap----


Will upload within the next 24 hours (unless I receive emails not to :-)


Regards, Marc





On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:18:33 +0000, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote:
> [as an individual]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've followed this document and have also read the current version 
> under WGLC. I support its publication as it solves a real problem and 
> is very comprehensively written.
> 
> There are one or two small nits (broken citations/references) that 
> ought to be fixed:
> 
http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-01.txt
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Carlos.
> 
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> This email is to initiate working group last call on the BFD on Link
>> Aggregate Group Interfaces document:
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-01
>> 
>> The last call will complete on November 8, the end of IETF week.  Time will
>> be available during the Vancouver IETF BFD session to discuss last call
>> comments.
>> 
>> Nobo Akiya will be serving as document shepherd (RFC 4858) for this WGLC.
>> 
>> Due to the small nature of the BFD working group and the fact that both
>> working group chairs have contributed to this document, we have gotten
>> Carlos Pignataro ([e-mail]) to volunteer to serve as an 
>> independent party to gauge working group consensus.
>> 
>> In order to facilitate the transparency of this WGLC, please remember to 
>> send all comments to the working group mailing list.
>> 
>> IPR declarations have been filed against this draft and the document 
>> authors
>> and contributors have been polled for any further IPR.  Current IPR
>> declarations may be seen at the following link:
>> 
>> 
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags
>> 
>> If you are aware of additional IPR against this document please 
>> declare so, per
>> the IETF Note Well.
>> 
>> Finally, the IEEE has expressed interest in the disposition of this draft.
>> They will likely provide additional commentary, if any, via the IETF 
>> liaison
>> process.  This process will likely happen after WGLC concludes.  Depending
>> on their feedback, WGLC may re-open to address their concerns.
>> 
>> -- Jeff (for the chairs)
>