Re: [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-haas-bfd-large-packets-00.txt]

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 11 July 2018 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7B5131088 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tnM-nwRFqdoN for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B929130EBD for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4023D1E28F; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:39:12 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-haas-bfd-large-packets-00.txt]
Message-ID: <20180711023911.GJ12853@pfrc.org>
References: <20180319161948.GA11643@pfrc.org> <CA+RyBmXU_in--u+JAmm47PUBxZvRJjjLAg3gevVfMUz6vqKmhA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmXU_in--u+JAmm47PUBxZvRJjjLAg3gevVfMUz6vqKmhA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/0UlGqOowqO0z2oo_xc26sODTjZ0>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 02:39:28 -0000

Greg,

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:40:00AM +0000, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> thank you for bringing up for discussion this interesting proposal. A
> question and a comment ahead of the meeting to save us time:
> 
>    - which applications will benefit from monitoring path MTU (PMTU) rather
>    from using PMTU discovery and updating the value;

Note that Albert and I will be bringing this to the upcoming Montreal
session for presentation.  We will be covering actual use cases for the
proposal (Albert's network being an impacted party).  We're looking forward
to using WG time for discussion on this point.

>    - note that "The Don't Fragment bit (Section 2.3 of [RFC0791]) of the IP
>    payload, when using IP encapsulations, MUST be set." is only applicable to
>    IPv4 environment as IPv6 does not allow IP fragmentation.

Thanks for noting this.  I failed to get this in the document refresh, and
will queue this for next version.

-- Jeff