Re: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 10 December 2019 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CD51200E5; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:13:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F1rqQCznMSCT; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2886120100; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 200116b824c23e009dab3539a50877e1.dip.versatel-1u1.de ([2001:16b8:24c2:3e00:9dab:3539:a508:77e1]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1iej4H-0006gu-OX; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:13:01 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re=3A_Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ie?= =?utf-8?Q?tf-bfd-vxlan-09=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWAQ04V2ZrAdrf1cqxuuuEOfbgaBTsWc87yY8YU+4MPYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:13:00 +0100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan@ietf.org, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, bfd-chairs@ietf.org, rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <52ED4E28-6757-41F9-AAF2-7628671CF809@kuehlewind.net>
References: <157598416346.9913.15971076491241071246.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmWAQ04V2ZrAdrf1cqxuuuEOfbgaBTsWc87yY8YU+4MPYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1575997986;6495fd25;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1iej4H-0006gu-OX
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/1X15EDibdYUutm6eQCxaYVyIbtQ>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:13:09 -0000

Hi Greg,

I also saw that you replied to Carlos comments but I don’t think I saw a reply to Olivier’s initial mail. The link you’ve sent below seems also a link to one of Carlos replies.

See here for Olivier’s review:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-bfd-vxlan-07-tsvart-lc-bonaventure-2019-05-31/

Mirja



> On 10. Dec 2019, at 17:41, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> Hi Mirja and Olivier,
> I apologize that some of Olivier's comments were not addressed. I've responded to Olivier's detailed comments in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/?q=Tsvart%20last%20call. I much appreciate your help in identifying the remaining questions and comments. 
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> 
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:22 AM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>; wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> UPDATE: I didn't not see a reply to the original issue raised by the TSV-ART
> review (Thanks Olivier!). Please have a lock and provide a response. I don't
> think this raises discuss level but I think some clarifications would be good!
> 
> This document describes the use of BFD in VXLAN, however, it does not specify
> any new protocol elements or extension. Therefore I would expect such a
> document to be informational. The shepherd write-up doesn't give any additional
> information about why this doc is PS.
> 
>