Re: The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Santosh P K <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com> Sat, 20 January 2018 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A291275F4 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:58:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5kfVl8oOMUF7 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C6E126CBF for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f4so2354568ioh.8 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:58:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hfSgzzuMOlvmsQYpfU3ZoPpHyyc+qYYTGpfYWJs9I9Q=; b=l/m4kWhww8wkNcqNZRHxlopdiI1y9j20bgIUA2f52UI9v/RKSh7U7Lz84Vi/W8gSYq 3jxRMWyKAo+ZoW2JLFlZU6w92soVgpL8Wqs+M+LTYDrWMkQWWBWOZeBW1p+sZ9xRCZCB NnwoMi5iMbQCFt8Cn+vkUEqUBNQQvyyxACPrtkh+ZFISwjerkkN6N3zrXCp8dATV4ukv 3F21ddy9zvUoO/hTRTDSz2sr32WfxkWeYdSYha7snxGg7+SClKU+XNaG5ezxM7aHmX1U uSjXyrotKAJWXy8EiUQ44h+g9rnQz2bHKdnt7vqUuetDbbDMAkScncDeuTHNmWwVP1kZ Kqxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hfSgzzuMOlvmsQYpfU3ZoPpHyyc+qYYTGpfYWJs9I9Q=; b=Sn1eBDQY+E/0vUovH5fvO+MKCuW2Dzn02grCeH3XW0r/zEPNR5cEKxoKZB/PnD1lzO sKTGQhASkfphmJS2nz6vcxZEVyMJdSpE4NgKxqjHt0RIeNHaoCnmXXRFatO2VBfGvQ3T ntgOqz8ylIlpiuBjReDtrAcbw6zCFGnMwgAa14rjrmotJPnSIdSOSPvKFgwwXqukvLX/ F7VecxJA7Htu6fL3amd+FSHiz11tTglWB7ok6P07hKWew+i5PS38D/lLli335hYhKK1e vFwbvQmjB1DSCLbYlYEO+d3kOYupNbmy3lVpHa9y2sHV5++4OopU33m1+gi2QZYq7qXT WI0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcqk2tXJQ4KjJ25v0ptmpGM2ww9SNVmxUE3T6K/GaceCC+dv+BN m/2/nmmTGWZafZHpy7d5Z64XATf0jJQMUEfc9T4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227m7dIZ9HLect9b1j/NS1Tkxe5PlTB3pgqb+qz5+I8KmDEMixx3jXczNbsiApl9g6HDx05p8J/KPFkzgtP7iOQ=
X-Received: by 10.107.8.148 with SMTP id h20mr603008ioi.204.1516417116214; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:58:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.143.203 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:58:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.143.203 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:58:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <607B64F7-DD73-414C-BF1C-7CCC1C2DC750@cisco.com>
References: <151386931708.12826.10490556245680582987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180103154925.GB5950@pfrc.org> <607B64F7-DD73-414C-BF1C-7CCC1C2DC750@cisco.com>
From: Santosh P K <santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 08:28:35 +0530
Message-ID: <CACi9rduF3JXYLBx5aHH_8CEhxWg6AXif521d5jHiBEh5Fkc0cg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f987e8b189305632c5fa1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/1hmyXOD0C-oDU7Mt3tZ4NstMEuE>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 02:58:39 -0000

As author of this draft I support this draft to. E adopted as working group
draft.

On Jan 20, 2018 5:31 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>; wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> I finally read this draft and support WG adoption (even though I’m NOT a
> fan of VXLAN, I realize it is a popular deployment scenario).
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 1/3/18, 10:45 AM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" <
> rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jhaas@pfrc.org>; wrote:
>
>     Working Group,
>
>     As a reminder, we have an active adoption call for the BFD for vxlan
>     document.  We've seen support for it on the list, but a few more people
>     offering commentary from outside of the author's list would be
> helpful. :-)
>
>     -- Jeff
>
>     On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 07:15:17AM -0800, IETF Secretariat wrote:
>     > The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in state
>     > Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeffrey Haas)
>     >
>     > The document is available at
>     > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan/
>     >
>     > Comment:
>     > The authors of draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan have asked for adoption
> of their
>     > draft by the BFD working group.  The BFD working group is chosen
> because the
>     > document has implications on base RFC 5880 procedures.
>     >
>     > Given the nature of the document, co-review and coordinated working
> group
>     > last call with the nvo3 Working Group is expected.
>     >
>     > The last date for comments for this adoption is January 20.  This
> extended
>     > period is intended to accommodate end of year holidays.
>     >
>     > A final note is that adoption is contingent upon our AD confirming
> this is
>     > within current WG charter, or permitting us otherwise to re-charter
>     > appropriately.
>
>
>
>