Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Sat, 20 June 2026 01:38 UTC
Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BB01044C898 for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1781919507; bh=p1fNVnOo9CIr2o5foKiO4rMf0Oqt1OtlMgIOyhxG64U=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=GQqUdG7EVdWw4SbNul9cCCbUynE88xeco4xwXx35VvcnyXBBRJ26Jn0bVre4g9r5b cdZDX/yl4G4NsvXBepcpES+VzjU6I1wzyXm15T97qWCZJRgrD6Ydio2m34/S9HqXE2 03PXIzWkTyAqrKuALgRNVhD3NtnpIsyq6exgHopo=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hi8_lfCnccjf for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-dl1-x1232.google.com (mail-dl1-x1232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216491044C891 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-dl1-x1232.google.com with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-13986d61b4eso290702c88.0 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1781919500; x=1782524300; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=84ZnQs+8SZOTxERSSo7GTSDP4XMib6YoH4Tjep/eWX0=; b=Pn047hmh7e5K/7UMliztaiFIaGT24sjjZCsCyK8ayN3lv+pdIWzErYzlFYKA7+6DZ+ /7RX4rVqfym0RKzs5DEYBL9TU5iw/zkLfLgGt7RTZiYt3a7TdAGbPqTQEkKNDRPqOckp RDlDOf0ZO+NckdEAkEeMGybQKFv4VFIvO12JAbALQo0nj/6+42+ESM3F1kAyJAag5kS0 AQhVqkfvdsdvrKw5xummRBICpqa+WwzXg2q0UswePEsSXsTJWu+9MZdVuq0wR+ODIS1m NK3FSZgE5mdWmT1gI4P6d9KSBpJ3jwT0DjYuJhiX+g1a6sEVStka1zs4nOFcmBilLOpT BUrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781919500; x=1782524300; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=84ZnQs+8SZOTxERSSo7GTSDP4XMib6YoH4Tjep/eWX0=; b=Sgu+RSgzhM5RKiOWlJjrpxAofUd9ZFlzEhIdXH08J3z4yHwU+wqbj6llLDICarTdge BwrbR7k3l38KV/jWsy9r3KMd0SUgmni3U4QidE7AZVLFLcG+XdcCazF9+EI69fwediDQ ehxSRt1U2jOonD8WGJ4PJFFBbU6UEdGqBIZAaYoo1pqBytzGoiOQVCBVTS4XII2sbtQI 6yJ5Z0ZaAyZBRYT4ekOKRM+4gGKWR+DtaOddrqG9CZ/BsSrJd0W7mqU0JWSvx8j8YGtQ BXqgCWw1zCA58ue1qt3v6pLbE70fwd7P0vpThlD3AzX7cbE3hGx6dFoFBCD2KWhJz7Eh Beug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwhCTkvd1leT3uIj/jkCyz7y+uwDW89R2MTlaQiOZ2m+UTd8qij pck52+0ysxu3rFPXbWAWlEcsJzZS9wp7kktXIWjWR/UHAdTd7wdCS6RP
X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7ckIGcff11gmyTUV3YE57a4GbTYtgQHNS93ZjvmmDimXsYN358p5rcSjTTvGqaz DRB5f687RbqzkHaHeH3Cz5HfN0oe60ixrasZh8XT4eYkmxYOEaiosYc7duKDJK4pedkUtg31EDX R3j+jeVAVAgdNQV79AvW/x40VCJ9avD86xHpn4co7g9qwbHGMYG53fEAD07uHfOL9aYjUce6Zon gS1Gc6+J6c7bwrFIwcwojlnHSyhuU6cLLBk7nlzyADsHwwdfe6ChqIrgQ/k1Dq6YAoIxM5iU1uP vr7rmStlacwysmx1/2BFj8dHQ6hokXb8Wo7i0JrH8v9o9gn6lQno7M4cIV8zTmqRxPOap5GA41L lvWSikmjt3f59Tr1+0XGABCih0Hxv5+o4UqxPbaslJI4i2+cQcm2CcTIdVBs/lYtfRWDxgrdwkT wilrwBEDUcpRUxpORRwRhSSULZKtm5myGCA8vQT5ATlQtIeQ6LSo/xQm6DOu0jZyQEIgyh
X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:627:b0:139:86cf:c305 with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-139ad677293mr1031053c88.3.1781919499969; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-180-189-3.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.180.189.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a92af1059eb24-139add5824csm1018451c88.10.2026.06.19.18.38.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <0B7F721F-B6D9-4A23-AB50-2F97DE40BAA9@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A676182C-12EE-4F27-831C-4CFE5C66A59E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.21\))
Subject: Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:38:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <178190194065.15.4215247475115449406@rfc-editor.org>
To: Ashesh Mishra <mishra.ashesh@gmail.com>, Ankur Saxena <akki2006@gmail.com>, Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com>, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
References: <178190194065.15.4215247475115449406@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.21)
Message-ID-Hash: 3ESUUY225JZJBJWQVQPPASPT4PV57YKY
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3ESUUY225JZJBJWQVQPPASPT4PV57YKY
X-MailFrom: mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtg-bfd.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/2qprxGiOMD8RHSJeoFZFEJdzKlo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtg-bfd-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-leave@ietf.org>
Congratulations to everyone. For some, it is their first RFC. > On Jun 19, 2026, at 1:45 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > RFC 9985 > > Title: Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication > Author: M. Jethanandani, > A. Mishra, > J. Haas, > A. Saxena, > M. Bhatia > Status: Experimental > Stream: IETF > Date: June 2026 > Mailbox: mjethanandani@gmail.com, > mishra.ashesh@outlook.com, > jhaas@pfrc.org, > ankurpsaxena@gmail.com, > manav@ionosnetworks.com > Pages: 20 > > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-36 > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9985 > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC9985 > > This document describes an experimental optimization to Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication. This optimization enables BFD to scale better when there is a desire to use authentication where applying the same authentication mechanism to every BFD Control Packet may adversely impact performance. This optimization partitions BFD Authentication into a more computationally intensive (MCI) mechanism that is applied to BFD significant changes and a less computationally intensive (LCI) mechanism that is applied to the majority of BFD Control Packets. > > This document is a product of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Working Group of the IETF. > > EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the > Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any > kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. > Distribution of this memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search/ > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/series/rfc-download/ > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
- RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding D… rfc-editor
- Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwardi… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwardi… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwardi… Manav Bhatia
- Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwardi… xiao.min2