Re: Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Jeffrey Haas <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 06:33:16PM +0200, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
> Hello Alissa,
> 
> thanks for your review.
> I'm fine with discussing this but wonder if we should tie it to this draft.
> I would prefer that we collectively discuss that and once we reach a
> decision we start applying it.

It's also worth noting that some form of meta-syntactic name would be needed
for these sorts of contexts as well.  As noted elsewhere, IANA is a name
currently under IETF control.  Additionally, "IANA maintained" has long
tradition for these sorts of registries, certainly back to the MIB days.
You may wish to seek history on this matter from prior OPS chairs in that
context.


My suggestion is that this discuss be cleared and perhaps raise this during
the wgchairs session.


-- Jeff