BFD WG adoption for draft-haas-bfd-large-packets

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Sat, 17 November 2018 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E83130E0E for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 05:58:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UiMFxkNpbi1Y for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 05:58:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCACA12872C for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 05:58:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=21510; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1542463107; x=1543672707; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=DMMNCXtXaXm7Dnj5Ibu4AKJM2hWTmu7GhmIh/Rdl0c0=; b=h9Lj9ebLzOeLS2VUXkgfW4dc5xyd3Eyt+sKtNwaYqLDeux+EnyIRLfVZ P659fTZlcyTUGkHMefO2iCfWiMQg+1UhafbOilHXDu9YcmeM0uoElHs/M 1Kp4DP7peZBo4EHo38LwoH4C5b0HD5d9sEbhC/cJqtLd/jqvtnnmOSnkk g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAACWHfBb/4UNJK1jGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ12ZoECJwqDbogYi36CDZc2FIFmCwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BI4RJAheDPSI0CQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIU8AQMDI2YCARkDAQIrAgICMB0IAgQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BEoMhAYEdZA+neYEvhEFAhRoFjAUXgUA/gTgfhWcCAwGBKgESAT+CZDGCJgK?= =?us-ascii?q?OeIYzikQJAoZ4ii0YgViFCIodjTmKNgIRFIEnHzhkcXAVOyoBgkGLHIU+QTG?= =?us-ascii?q?MA4EfgR8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,244,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="201466752"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2018 13:58:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wAHDwQ1k011309 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:58:26 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:58:25 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:58:25 -0600
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets@ietf.org>
Subject: BFD WG adoption for draft-haas-bfd-large-packets
Thread-Topic: BFD WG adoption for draft-haas-bfd-large-packets
Thread-Index: AQHUZn7F2obCS5tWFUCJRL2ls+mZdKVUPvwA
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:58:25 +0000
Message-ID: <295F72CA-5F0A-44B1-BA3C-AB6E07B4E99A@cisco.com>
References: <E052CA19-228D-4271-BF9E-7499255E7C53@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E052CA19-228D-4271-BF9E-7499255E7C53@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.3.181015
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.172.120]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_295F72CA5F0A44B1BA3CAB6E07B4E99Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/5c73ui3zcvYRdswZS0AL2hkfL9E>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:58:30 -0000

Hi authors.,

This document has passed adoption as a BFD WG document.

Please resubmit the doc as draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets. Please also note that while there was strong support for adopting the document, the following points/questions were raised and should be discussed further within the WG as the document progresses:

  1.  Is there necessity to send all packets as large packets or alternatively can that be done periodically?
  2.  Authors should consider adding some text wrt use of BFD echo in the document

Also, there was a suggestion made to use BFD for PMTUD (as opposed to the BFD session failing when expected MTU isn’t met). My take on this is that it falls out of our charter but the PMTUD use-case should be considered if/when we recharter, I’d like to hear your thoughts on this.

Regards,
Reshad.

From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 9:06 PM
To: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: BFD WG adoption for draft-haas-bfd-large-packets

Hello BFD WG,

We have received an adoption request for “BFD encapsulated in large packets”.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-bfd-large-packets/

The adoption call will end on Friday Nov 9th.

Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support”  or “no/do not support”. If you do not support adoption, please state your reasons.

Regards,
Reshad & Jeff.