Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Mon, 22 June 2026 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CD3104E05E6 for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2026 19:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1782096109; bh=gwoS5dMTQ1jg8/KNDtOWdkmnrkEJLzbNmnCgwwBp2JQ=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject; b=pGDWCpy11YPlkix08tLJxYF6BbB+xT2t2WjOrK1SUnjlcj2qr45WY3g3c+UOndd4x jAu3PYFlGaMBmxKmVkUzXo2FE49pGutq0SJOuEmUsI+mp9iRmbb9pvDbmB38Xy3ldy Mx2zsPOrgxvN62JHQWNS32qp6/Mm5YCwdrH5FpgY=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DfXyTzHawQdT for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2026 19:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [160.30.148.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15BBA104E05DF for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2026 19:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4gkCBy25K8z8XrrJ; Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:41:46 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 65M2fa9x051750; Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:41:36 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:41:37 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc6a38a0e1253-e706d
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20260622104137712-mkekdA-owCtr0Aw6Jslk@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAG1kdohoFye8-KJxZNenwYEk5anbnsj0ikCww9Jd7qQHiP+kKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 178190194065.15.4215247475115449406@rfc-editor.org,0B7F721F-B6D9-4A23-AB50-2F97DE40BAA9@gmail.com,20260620135632.GB1513@pfrc.org,CAG1kdohoFye8-KJxZNenwYEk5anbnsj0ikCww9Jd7qQHiP+kKg@mail.gmail.com
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:41:37 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: manavbhatia@gmail.com
Subject: Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 65M2fa9x051750
X-TLS: YES
X-ENVELOPE-SENDER: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-SOURCE-IP: 10.5.228.133 unknown Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:41:46 +0800
X-CLEAN: YES
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6A38A0EA.001/4gkCBy25K8z8XrrJ
Message-ID-Hash: MWJFAXHVTKGT4LCMEFDTYVI6QFQVPU2B
X-Message-ID-Hash: MWJFAXHVTKGT4LCMEFDTYVI6QFQVPU2B
X-MailFrom: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtg-bfd.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mishra.ashesh@gmail.com, akki2006@gmail.com, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/6wJ4-R4e5Jkv-T_MtFDy1bhO8ck>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtg-bfd-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-leave@ietf.org>

That's really a long journey!
Congratulations to the authors!

Cheers,
Xiao Min


Original


From: ManavBhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
  
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>;
  
Cc: Ashesh Mishra <mishra.ashesh@gmail.com>;Ankur Saxena <akki2006@gmail.com>;rtg-bfd@ietf. <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>;
Date: 2026年06月21日 14:57
  
Subject: Re: RFC 9985 on Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication
  




11+ years in the making, and we finally did it!

I want to extend my deepest gratitude to everyone in the WG, and especially to my brilliant co-authors. Thank you all for your immense hard work, endless patience, and perseverance over the last decade. It’s been an absolute privilege working with you all.

Thanks, Manav


On Sat, Jun 20, 2026 at 7:26 PM Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

And similarly congratulations to the authors and the WG for RFC 9986, the
 companion document for the ISAAC mechanism of implementing the optimized
 procedures.
 
 -- Jeff
 
 On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 06:38:03PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
 > Congratulations to everyone. For some, it is their first RFC.
 > 
 > > On Jun 19, 2026, at 1:45 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
 > > 
 > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
 > > 
 > >        RFC 9985
 > > 
 > >        Title:      Optimizing Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication
 > >        Author:     M. Jethanandani,
 > >                    A. Mishra,
 > >                    J. Haas,
 > >                    A. Saxena,
 > >                    M. Bhatia
 > >        Status:     Experimental
 > >        Stream:     IETF
 > >        Date:       June 2026
 > >        Mailbox:    mjethanandani@gmail.com,
 > >                    mishra.ashesh@outlook.com,
 > >                    jhaas@pfrc.org,
 > >                    ankurpsaxena@gmail.com,
 > >                    manav@ionosnetworks.com
 > >        Pages:      20
 > > 
 > > 
 > >        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-36
 > > 
 > >        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9985
 > > 
 > >        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9985
 > > 
 > > This document describes an experimental optimization to Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authentication. This optimization enables BFD to scale better when there is a desire to use authentication where applying the same authentication mechanism to every BFD Control Packet may adversely impact performance. This optimization partitions BFD Authentication into a more computationally intensive (MCI) mechanism that is applied to BFD significant changes and a less computationally intensive (LCI) mechanism that is applied to the majority of BFD Control Packets.
 > > 
 > > This document is a product of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Working Group of the IETF.
 > > 
 > > EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
 > > Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any
 > > kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
 > > Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
 > > 
 > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
 > > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
 > >  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
 > >  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
 > > 
 > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search/
 > > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/series/rfc-download/
 > > 
 > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
 > > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
 > > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
 > > unlimited distribution.
 > > 
 > > 
 > > The RFC Editor Team
 > > 
 > 
 > 
 > Mahesh Jethanandani
 > mjethanandani@gmail.com
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >