[Errata Verified] RFC5880 (6926)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 07 April 2022 20:09 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4D43A16F0; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l-FZGtOZSlsJ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8913A161E; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 2892AEB6BB; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: glebs@mikrotik.com, dkatz@juniper.net, dward@juniper.net
Subject: [Errata Verified] RFC5880 (6926)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220407200949.2892AEB6BB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:09:49 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/84uPfthtltqrnonPTQ1SNWXCt1I>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:09:54 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5880, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6926 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Glebs Ivanovskis <glebs@mikrotik.com> Date Reported: 2022-04-06 Verified by: RFC Editor Section: 6.8.6 Original Text ------------- Set bfd.RemoteState to the value of the State (Sta) field. Corrected Text -------------- Set bfd.RemoteSessionState to the value of the State (Sta) field. Notes ----- The variable bfd.RemoteState is not defined in section 6.8.1 and is only mentioned once in the entire document. It is likely a typo and a similarly named bfd.RemoteSessionState was meant instead. -------------------------------------- RFC5880 (draft-ietf-bfd-base-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Publication Date : June 2010 Author(s) : D. Katz, D. Ward Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Area : Routing Stream : IETF
- [Errata Verified] RFC5880 (6926) RFC Errata System