IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sun, 10 November 2013 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A6611E80D9 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 14:29:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JVrOuWhn5BDn for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 14:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586E011E8175 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 14:29:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2895; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384122585; x=1385332185; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Ut2bmVYlxmkSP0tqDGLmacNulF2saxU3dYTY2ad661U=; b=KdphVTpGT09qavwbnOYj0uJuX8ozcg+U6flWo45qcpsN6X6Ljt33HwYE LkqnsXnHFbdgjCSovPJVxgKicDv0ipl0DlonV09BvpjKUuiaP8coUQnlo K/xtBvqGGnyFFX8MisO6FprrHATKefhJ0i5TuI7cRRDLwWAD1x0MVLJLo 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 203
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAD0IgFKtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4U78PgSkWdIIlAQEBAwFuCwULAgEIDjgyJQIEDgUOh20GDb0mjh6BSQeDIIEQA5AwgTCCToNhgS+QW4MmgXE5
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,674,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="283143106"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2013 22:29:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAAMTiwh020805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 22:29:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.229]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:29:44 -0600
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Subject: Re: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8
Thread-Topic: WGLC for BFD over Link Aggregate Group Interfaces - ends November 8
Thread-Index: AQHO3mRas6v9ADVrWkWBxo6hb1kgOw==
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 22:29:43 +0000
Message-ID: <6C38E01D-2C15-4F18-9A19-06486DC48C50@cisco.com>
References: <20131024191431.GO17538@pfrc>
In-Reply-To: <20131024191431.GO17538@pfrc>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.115.56]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C22679D-D6A5-457B-AF2E-3F12A39C37C5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 22:29:50 -0000

WG:

Hi,

The BFD co-chairs asked me to gauge consensus on the WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-01, which ended November 8th.

There is clearly good support for this document, and I see strong consensus to move forward including the mention of interoperable implementations. There was also a good discussion (and conclusion) on the list about interface identification.

I captured the following notes:
1. Please fix idnits warnings

Thanks,

— Carlos.

On Oct 24, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> This email is to initiate working group last call on the BFD on Link
> Aggregate Group Interfaces document:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-01
> 
> The last call will complete on November 8, the end of IETF week.  Time will
> be available during the Vancouver IETF BFD session to discuss last call
> comments.
> 
> Nobo Akiya will be serving as document shepherd (RFC 4858) for this WGLC.
> 
> Due to the small nature of the BFD working group and the fact that both
> working group chairs have contributed to this document, we have gotten
> Carlos Pignataro (cpignata@cisco.com) to volunteer to serve as an 
> independent party to gauge working group consensus.
> 
> In order to facilitate the transparency of this WGLC, please remember to 
> send all comments to the working group mailing list.
> 
> IPR declarations have been filed against this draft and the document authors
> and contributors have been polled for any further IPR.  Current IPR
> declarations may be seen at the following link:
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags
> 
> If you are aware of additional IPR against this document please declare so, per
> the IETF Note Well.
> 
> Finally, the IEEE has expressed interest in the disposition of this draft.
> They will likely provide additional commentary, if any, via the IETF liaison
> process.  This process will likely happen after WGLC concludes.  Depending
> on their feedback, WGLC may re-open to address their concerns.
> 
> -- Jeff (for the chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email