Re: IETF-106 agenda?
Jeffrey Haas <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sat, 09 November 2019 19:28 UTC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6D912008D for <email@example.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:28:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([18.104.22.168]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AAlk1ZmQ8IkX for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:28:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [22.214.171.124]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA08712001A for <email@example.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:28:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7E9A91E2F5; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 14:32:00 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 14:32:00 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: IETF-106 agenda?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:28:15 -0000
Working Group, We will be attempting to meet at IETF-106. There's just enough business to discuss to warrant using our time slot. Note as below: We do not currently have a minutes taker. If we do not have one (ideally volunteering ahead of time) by meeting start time, we will suspend without a meeting. The authors of BFD for vxlan are requested to prepare slides covering changes since the last IETF and a summary of the rather energetic discussion we've had since that meeting. Additionally, please summarize the open issues since we have a few still being discussed on the list. Please recall that BFD is meeting on Tuesday. Please send me your slides by Sunday. ----- Current targeted agenda: Chairs update: 5 mins - Jeff Haas BFD for vxlan: 15 minutes - TBD BFD for Large Packets: 5 minutes - Jeff BFD Demand Mode: 10 minutes - Greg Using One-Arm BFD in Cloud Network: 10 minutes -- Jeff On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:15:35PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > Working Group, > > A session request had gone in for IETF 106 to accommodate the need for a > possible session. The agenda, to this point, had been left as an open > question primarily to accommodate need to close on lingering questions in > active work. In particular, this was for two items: > > - BFD for vxlan > - BFD for Large Packets > > (For transparency, I am an author on BFD for large packets) > > As of this afternoon, we seem to have drafts submitted that cover the known > open issues on both of these drafts. In particular, the work to get us to > the latest draft for the vxlan document took over 150 messages. > > If BFD meets, agenda time was primarily reserved to reconcile open issues on > these documents. > > Discussion on BFDv2 is currently deferred for next IETF to focus the Working > Group's limited attention on closing open work. > > That said, if we have other topics to consider, please submit them for > consideration. If we have no such topics, and the discussion on the above > two drafts seems likely to conclude well over e-mail, we may consider > canceling the session. > > As a final note, since Reshad is unable to make it to IETF-106, if we do > decide to continue with our meeting, we will require the commitment for a > minutes taker. Reshad and I often will cover that for each other over the > course of a session, but I won't be able to sustain that on my own. > > -- Jeff, for the chairs.