Re: Adoption call for draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-* (ends April 30, 2017)

Greg Mirsky <> Tue, 27 June 2017 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7876A12EB9B for <>; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFXhVLmdXVrP for <>; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57AFE1200FC for <>; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r67so12702383ota.1 for <>; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Bi2ZR0YUY2PxmD2pDCeQ61ma/wI07r4zllH+/WRkkVM=; b=EfkEmJR/rclZvPoJPJumR4HGkuk1bnPY1fw3xkbWid8sVVMCaSWn/cCcB08K4h8hRF tUzT+4iJ+dEkMwbJwNyCfXEmrPiacAcjUWi8IBDM/TiD7hXkBBz7uRfiHPWH9xAAiM+2 SrDt/uRQ4CdD34RJXQO9IeHom0uYvkkmvR4EEYDzPsDbGavXR3wrTA/Bx2cctmCDsqOh 18DkPCKQi/uGVBcLoj9c2682cyJLazost7SoUOHjaz/qmtqXIXF9hrykJVczDuTHAx2A YU2yz5phSQKk21FxS5SfFQvYCrPtvhI7VVGOwXg1c3z7TdawK+vn1qNpfxoT9F7BlXco b+zw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Bi2ZR0YUY2PxmD2pDCeQ61ma/wI07r4zllH+/WRkkVM=; b=RMbr0gpiSCg4+RW9F8XxLx2MdfXYY3TKU82ReiREKOWRyLYO6U3qMr5i/N0YgNNpa+ lY0CwEZzKsWvsphGMUE0s8qrsr4NAhcYhBpYnPVfc1MVY++j0KjQgpgNgdgdxt8+jsIT VLEywBDCRymSJOZV7WPFMLExtHTxsdh7p37dqAFRrrkc+v0jY3j21NAbuTLZgKVq348d V5NZ/+WGKkuqwl8w2MSxdbVG+OGd+bUQz01kCXZxu/kcHsEw4rMGv9fkbQ6NvZ4vPqyB Y/IPrAAogIySnwzY7y53Velge/hZCbK+zlmJ/MEC+k/xx5PYfofXznw37ua2c0oL38a4 c0+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwRrWp4WWY3wtMury0Wthotcs9WM/Hu8BLMm1fqbq/uvppw4pd8 WuKrooEDU/q4czJFHvya75pKsTf7u9rL
X-Received: by with SMTP id l35mr1841646ote.52.1498526457436; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Greg Mirsky <>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:20:57 -0500
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Adoption call for draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-* (ends April 30, 2017)
To: "" <>, "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <>, Jeffrey Haas <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113df76e2e9f240552e6e18a"
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 01:21:00 -0000

Hi Jeff and Reshad, et. al,

would like to thank all who took time to share their views on the
drafts, problem, and the proposed solution. It would be of great help
to us, authors, to understand which of three aspects of WG adoption
call we should concentrate on improving:

   - clarity of the writing;
   - scope of the problem;
   - proposed solution.


Hi authors,

We do not yet have consensus to adopt these 2 drafts as BFD WG documents.


On 2017-04-17, 6:55 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Jeffrey Haas"
< on behalf of>
<>amp;gt>; wrote:

>Working Group,
>The authors of BFD on Multi-Chass Link Aggregation Group Interfaces for IP
>and MPLS have requested BFD working group adoption for their drafts.
>These drafts were previously presented at IETF-96.
>Please note that IPR has been declare against these drafts.  The IPR
>declaration may be found from the datatracker links.
>Please indicate your support/lack of support to the mailing list.
>-- Jeff and Reshad