Re: WG Adoption request for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand

<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn> Sat, 20 October 2018 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245D0130E1A for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ri9O7qgGmfWK for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40DDB130E06 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id D617F72C0473466543E3; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:59:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.200]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with SMTP id w9K1xcUl022755; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:59:38 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:59:39 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:59:39 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afd5bca8c0bfab8da41
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201810200959390293198@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20181017222431.GK17157@pfrc.org>
References: 20181017222431.GK17157@pfrc.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
To: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFdHIEFkb3B0aW9uIHJlcXVlc3QgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LW1pcnNreS1iZmQtbXBscy1kZW1hbmQ=?=
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn w9K1xcUl022755
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/ERBIHCOowNhkvSS6rr1_Eze7dHg>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 01:59:50 -0000

I support WG adoption of this draft. Use of the demand mode for p2p LSP monitoring is feasible and required.






Best Regards,


Xiao Min










原始邮件



发件人:JeffreyHaas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
收件人:rtg-bfd@ietf.org <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>;
日 期 :2018年10月18日 06:24
主 题 :WG Adoption request for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand


Working Group,

The BFD chairs have received an adoption request for 
"BFD in Demand Mode over Point-to-Point MPLS LSP"
(draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand).

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand/

The adoption call will end on the Friday after IETF 103, November 9.

Note that there is are existing IPR statements on this draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3301/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3104/

Please indicate to the mailing list whether you support adoption of this
draft.

-- Jeff & Reshad