Re: RFC 9978 on Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Stability
xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Tue, 30 June 2026 01:12 UTC
Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F094910A59A45 for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1782781973; bh=ZYPKrTooGyIlquhENC0VL7MtrUi5gJRFJ7Kz+6iEqUE=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject; b=fq8/ipdo3hwwd/Hs8Jq77ZspmUWqRPaWEeFfbd4MAZrRRj7xep7yWtNV+TIwSIy9v lyaCVBMF27AkdfQO0sARVWTudS4TJMkDzsz6cNqmebah953Ydo+Mee9vG6Pq5wWH/z w4TeccC03DqMaBXrnMqYsQBAiN2UuptDK5LRf7J4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KWdArS_xFxZN for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [160.30.148.34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9225110A598C9 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4gq4qD4FRpz5B0yy; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:11:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app08.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.206]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 65U1BNCu063456; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:11:23 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:11:24 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc6a4317bcc83-10f7f
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20260630091124625m1HpKorATkCRUBoYFU8Nb@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <E1C0CDFE-4356-4BFD-8462-F7E6718B0520@pfrc.org>
References: 178277426589.13.5107412850243557704@rfc-editor.org,E1C0CDFE-4356-4BFD-8462-F7E6718B0520@pfrc.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:11:24 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: jhaas@pfrc.org
Subject: Re: RFC 9978 on Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Stability
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 65U1BNCu063456
X-TLS: YES
X-ENVELOPE-SENDER: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-SOURCE-IP: 10.5.228.133 unknown Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:11:36 +0800
X-CLEAN: YES
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6A4317C8.000/4gq4qD4FRpz5B0yy
Message-ID-Hash: 7PNAK7HKV7KLLDWSBX3A5W5U3XIDLLMT
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7PNAK7HKV7KLLDWSBX3A5W5U3XIDLLMT
X-MailFrom: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtg-bfd.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/FHwXubPtac8DEqn6RwD37KlgTKE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtg-bfd-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-leave@ietf.org>
Congratulations! Best Regards, Xiao Min Original From: JeffreyHaas <jhaas@pfrc.org> To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Date: 2026年06月30日 09:02 Subject: Re: RFC 9978 on Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Stability Congratulations authors and working group! Another document with a long path to completion, but worth the effort. -- Jeff > On Jun 29, 2026, at 19:04, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > RFC 9978 > > Title: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Stability > Author: A. Mishra, > M. Jethanandani, > A. Saxena, > S. Pallagatti, > M. Chen > Status: Experimental > Stream: IETF > Date: June 2026 > Mailbox: mishra.ashesh@outlook.com, > mjethanandani@gmail.com, > ankurpsaxena@gmail.com, > santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com, > mach.chen@outlook.com > Pages: 19 > > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bfd-stability-21 > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9978 > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC9978 > > This document describes extensions to the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) protocol to measure BFD Stability. Specifically, it describes a mechanism for the detection of BFD packet loss. > > This document is a product of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Working Group of the IETF. > > EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the > Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any > kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. > Distribution of this memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search/ > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/series/rfc-download/ > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team
- RFC 9978 on Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (B… rfc-editor
- Re: RFC 9978 on Bidirectional Forwarding Detectio… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: RFC 9978 on Bidirectional Forwarding Detectio… xiao.min2
- Re: RFC 9978 on Bidirectional Forwarding Detectio… Reshad Rahman
- Re: RFC 9978 on Bidirectional Forwarding Detectio… Mahesh Jethanandani