Re: Adoption request for draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jeff, Reshad, et. al.,

yes, support as co-author.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Jeffrey Haas <[e-mail]> wrote:

> We had presentations on draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-(mpls|ip) during
> IETF 96.
> This work covers multi-chassis forms of BFD-on-LAG, similar to RFC 7130.
>
> After that presentation, the sense of the room was that this work was
> something the WG would like to adopt.
>
> This e-mail begins a formal adoption poll for one or both of these drafts.
> This poll ends on April 16.  The timing of this poll is to give WG members
> a
> chance to read the draft for comment during the WG session in Chicago on
> Monday and also to set the date for two weeks after IETF 98 ends.
>
> Please respond to this mail to indicate your support or lack of support for
> this adoption.  Unless otherwise noted, support will be interpreted as
> support for *both* documents.
>
> The chairs wish to remind the Working Group that these documents have IPR
> asserted against the mechanisms contained in these drafts.
>
> -- Jeff and Reshad
>
>