Re: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: (with COMMENT)

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mirja and Olivier,
I apologize that some of Olivier's comments were not addressed. I've
responded to Olivier's detailed comments in
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/?q=Tsvart%20last%20call. I
much appreciate your help in identifying the remaining questions and
comments.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:22 AM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> UPDATE: I didn't not see a reply to the original issue raised by the
> TSV-ART
> review (Thanks Olivier!). Please have a lock and provide a response. I
> don't
> think this raises discuss level but I think some clarifications would be
> good!
>
> This document describes the use of BFD in VXLAN, however, it does not
> specify
> any new protocol elements or extension. Therefore I would expect such a
> document to be informational. The shepherd write-up doesn't give any
> additional
> information about why this doc is PS.
>
>
>