Re: WG Adoption request for draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jeff, Reshad, et al.,
now I can confirm that the IPR licensing terms to this draft were updated
by this IPR Disclosure <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3359/> submitted
on December 11, 2018. Much appreciate your consideration and welcome
technical comments on the draft.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:10 PM Jeffrey Haas <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Greg,
>
> Apologies for the long delay in reply.
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 02:40:50PM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> > I respectfully ask to summarize the comments that were shared with you
> and
> > to publish them to the WG without naming the authors.
>
> Tersely:
> - The document is not addressing fundamental issues.
> - It is encumbered by IPR.
> - Observed list traffic regarding question on the feature was not
>   satisfactorily converging.
>
> > And I have to admit that I don't understand your suggestion to use the
> > Errata. The procedures to apply the Demand mode described in the draft
> are
> > not in contradiction with RFC 5880, so the suggestion to use Errata
> > surprised me.
>
> I will respond on my own analysis in detail hopefully this week.  I am
> awaiting the resolution of a particular bit of correspondence before
> determining the tenor of my response.
>
> -- Jeff
>