IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF-106 agenda?

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sat, 09 November 2019 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1355F12008D for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:49:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=IPJv3r4I; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=d07TshEX
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2VH7-FxfRMZa for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:49:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9998512001A for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:49:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7995; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1573328987; x=1574538587; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=mOLRauFlkcV0c8vypJC//Jfk5dw2UVZc0FA/RGDE04A=; b=IPJv3r4I2Em+NH1BboOdqeKeOT01tyHWNPtBYsjI1h3iATas4W7M25tx fX8WQNrLxM0VC2l7tA8Ii0a6NREbZNJNps4bFiiyAIaepwCp96TJv/p1y sWvXZhRcJgVWWuR9I3YQy5HSCnLzJ4K8zhxavWl1mMa1ov/FgoVJ2EVMO s=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:/T4U6h8X++0Kbv9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+8ZR7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVcWdCEL9JeLjRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CpAACNF8dd/4cNJK1lHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgWwFAQELAYFKUAWBRCAECyoKhB+DRgOKbII5iX2JRoRigS6BJANUCQEBAQwBAS0CAQGEQAIXg3kkNgcOAgMLAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFUgIEDAYRHQEBNwEPAgEGAj8DAgICHxEUEQIEDgUigwCBek0DLgGQA5BjAoE4iGB1gTKCfgEBBYUKDQuCFwmBNgGMExiBQD+BOAwTghc1PoEEgReCAyaDETKCLIlWgz2CeYVDiT2OR0EKgiWQXFaEEhuCPYdhj1uQCIkHjBSDGgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBWQgqgVhwFWUBgkE+EhEUkDYMDAuDUIpTdIEojX4EgS0BLwFeAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,286,1569283200"; d="scan'208,217";a="662867161"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Nov 2019 19:49:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (xch-aln-019.cisco.com [173.36.7.29]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xA9Jnk1m016480 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 9 Nov 2019 19:49:46 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (173.36.7.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:49:45 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:49:45 -0600
Received: from NAM05-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:49:45 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=UtsbGJHYtH468+kLqaMOiM3CyoFD5qZC5+/W7m4dWYuF4w8OAF/48D5caNh+UonXGtlhSrhMLAp5iqXKgMpfsKhYSwRX3utbkN8j+RlflO+JexLr1s/WPS6qdkIj1yN31JcQ3F9PPoy/7XNXoBKiptfNlmtg932JRLoL7h21ldy42D7bnKmajBG84LnC2zioyAy8RdVxIDgak47lFBEDyL+n7v2uVxJZDiUbwePNEA8wg4B0A0wVX9y5ktrj8Nrg3lKFncOASGNJaubIPMbPGcJxHG6oxEA9/iQQ7Nt1NNK/bEXH7V7tN4RlZIae8K64F/CADQo/UMkkqCda2OEfmA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mOLRauFlkcV0c8vypJC//Jfk5dw2UVZc0FA/RGDE04A=; b=NIHoWbnsLnkr0KS4KhBRBjYvg4zokRCaMGk84lGMQ/1zrsSttIPUbEsPD5Tl7S8CDRoWFLd2tPu6cDqfzvB6Jlig91mBpPoF63g1Xt6aYzXakZ7V3gs251yxPVu8Fn3vVizDpjrR25AJRgy1Fw4BIAnOPR7nYOd4OnwtVn+/Dhg5OYEFgr/uM7kwboMZ/LyNXTBmV5LvT3RHBedaam/rewTqcSmQSAlpSJE4l+uQAuudRGThN85Q9qnJU4qqw6R3UGVqlP/ifz9EOEh5HnITPwReNt9oefS2RgeOY8hm3fQ3k9L99G448ab6Or3neqQP7H+o/6SzYf9nVVf3Q5J6Mg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mOLRauFlkcV0c8vypJC//Jfk5dw2UVZc0FA/RGDE04A=; b=d07TshEXbedQgIOW4Zqb9Q2/t+ci0U3ZcTjFCsOtljCpuWEJnfMVSetMhVbonCc4cNQC8kAuz7Edr/9osqWw8qhQNc5dT4yBgMFPBQHCpFLlQKC7bvkD+ZmvhxiZQ9ayrzeh+Xadp9/IPABVU78ZcbDv3N7tGE6SfLZDRYsrXcY=
Received: from BN6PR11MB0034.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.161.156.160) by BN6PR11MB4178.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.132.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2430.23; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 19:49:44 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB0034.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::502b:7ec7:4cb0:3781]) by BN6PR11MB0034.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::502b:7ec7:4cb0:3781%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2430.020; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 19:49:44 +0000
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: Jeff Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>, rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF-106 agenda?
Thread-Topic: IETF-106 agenda?
Thread-Index: AQHVkN/nkntDtAi4SUOyFKFIRIyq6qd2w7cAgAyIMoA=
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:49:44 +0000
Message-ID: <37C3B4B1-21F2-4368-914C-844959D01AAD@cisco.com>
References: <20191101181535.GA10713@pfrc.org> <CA+RyBmWA_MOzePJUaXRYEUCAvje33ie8ejjom56yDuCFTeSzsA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWA_MOzePJUaXRYEUCAvje33ie8ejjom56yDuCFTeSzsA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=cpignata@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.71]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ae522e76-29dc-4c49-a29e-08d7654df7ef
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB4178:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB41782A274A9AB8359DDDC22BC77A0@BN6PR11MB4178.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 021670B4D2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(346002)(136003)(376002)(199004)(189003)(51444003)(256004)(71190400001)(14444005)(5660300002)(71200400001)(6246003)(478600001)(486006)(446003)(76176011)(91956017)(54896002)(6512007)(11346002)(2616005)(476003)(81156014)(81166006)(4326008)(8936002)(7736002)(229853002)(236005)(14454004)(6486002)(8676002)(6916009)(6436002)(316002)(66556008)(6116002)(66446008)(3846002)(66476007)(64756008)(50226002)(36756003)(33656002)(1411001)(66574012)(76116006)(2906002)(86362001)(54906003)(66946007)(99286004)(66066001)(6506007)(53546011)(26005)(186003)(102836004)(25786009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR11MB4178; H:BN6PR11MB0034.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: JYXSYnqi/nabb878XAbK3Mkw+WJB7tLKUjFI/WSrM6Xmn5A2nbSej8+zdqz1kmMNmMKq5LhvrjtNQtYIqMLk/PYGjCkENRE7Uuw684c7/NYo10CYojRJkSVDr9gBGyPtEX3uZc6aeUcjphKeSyooGXxo0qFK9RntS0518zJg6riTIr12safYiIp2kLI1zZWWbjt5cw8eMvXqWwbDghCaQvWIPLWQY/+9e/eUWnMcYSSusRWi0yYA/L43SR9EvXPtNyZf8WGA0UnZY4RUa6cL9iJ76gp0xPj2vpuY4nXYkF6JcWp5BrQbRRvCrjJgNwA6w9ol4pp81jKlm9JkhQgUxWAJ5+bzHrDu8z9u5Vwo/ZReOIHCvPUuBsAcEx+kcb9qcZPuMruScwBxSX4bTTUkf9SegpUc8NEXw0dD7dDlRUYe0mICtjFxEnLBYspgm7pM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_37C3B4B121F24368914C844959D01AADciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ae522e76-29dc-4c49-a29e-08d7654df7ef
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Nov 2019 19:49:44.1489 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 8JihRhin+YWGULANtI9EAx46DYXx5iu8mV3omZQ/I/R0djWr5wA6KCBADQ87WPpmrDLImBOfxLVRNtfPecqIHA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB4178
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.29, xch-aln-019.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/J2IUXG8ICfZjU_FyFWHv7Qkejxk>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:49:50 -0000


2019/11/01 午後4:27、Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>>のメール:

Hi Jeff, et al.,
I think that it will be of interest to the group to get an update on the draft-mirmin-bfd-extended. We've added details on the use of the Padding TLV.
Also, would appreciate the opportunity to discuss the status of draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand at the meeting.


Is there a word for a recursive recurrent déjà vu?

Kindly,

Carlos.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:12 AM Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org<mailto:jhaas@pfrc.org>> wrote:
Working Group,

A session request had gone in for IETF 106 to accommodate the need for a
possible session.  The agenda, to this point, had been left as an open
question primarily to accommodate need to close on lingering questions in
active work.  In particular, this was for two items:

- BFD for vxlan
- BFD for Large Packets

(For transparency, I am an author on BFD for large packets)

As of this afternoon, we seem to have drafts submitted that cover the known
open issues on both of these drafts.  In particular, the work to get us to
the latest draft for the vxlan document took over 150 messages.

If BFD meets, agenda time was primarily reserved to reconcile open issues on
these documents.

Discussion on BFDv2 is currently deferred for next IETF to focus the Working
Group's limited attention on closing open work.

That said, if we have other topics to consider, please submit them for
consideration.  If we have no such topics, and the discussion on the above
two drafts seems likely to conclude well over e-mail, we may consider
canceling the session.

As a final note, since Reshad is unable to make it to IETF-106, if we do
decide to continue with our meeting, we will require the commitment for a
minutes taker.  Reshad and I often will cover that for each other over the
course of a session, but I won't be able to sustain that on my own.

-- Jeff, for the chairs.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email