draft-ietf-bfd-base-03.txt comments

Chezhian Renganathan <chezhian@redback.com> Wed, 17 August 2005 17:45 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E5RyJ-0000Uw-0M; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:45:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E5RyG-0000U3-IM for rtg-bfd@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:45:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA14160 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5SXq-0006eR-4P for rtg-bfd@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:21:47 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CE1CC38E8 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([]) by localhost (prattle []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02630-02 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trilobite.redback.com (trilobite.redback.com []) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D036CC38E7 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from redback.com (localhost []) by trilobite.redback.com (8.11.6/8.8.8/null redback bsdclient) with ESMTP id j7HHil518542 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4303778F.1080304@redback.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:44:47 -0700
From: Chezhian Renganathan <chezhian@redback.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040127
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: draft-ietf-bfd-base-03.txt comments
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org


Section 6.7.4 -
Unless I am missing something, it seems to me that the statement in braces
"roughly speaking, due to jitter"
should be applicable in the context of Detection Time rather than 
The DetectMult is just number of packets and there is no variance there with

Also, was there any thinking along the lines of making the "Reg Min Echo RX
Interval" field optional, keeping with the spirit of this function, 
being optional
with either modes. This field could potentially be set to all zeros for 
the entire
length of a session unless changed if the end systems support this